Re: Hah!

Article View: comp.bugs.2bsd

Article #79

#79

From: Steven M. Schultz
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 18:18

17 lines
1127 bytes

In article <1990Oct17.002046.2897@virtech.uucp> rickr@virtech.uucp (Rick Rodman) writes:
>I've been informed by the Usenix Association that they will only sell
>me a *binary* tape of 2bsd if I have a Unix source license.

	Something about that doesn't feel right.  There isn't such an
	animal as a "binary 2BSD" unless someone either creates a 
	pre-configured kernel for each requestor or has done the work
	of breaking out the configurable options into non-source files,
	I know I haven't done it.

>So, 2bsd is a dead product, and the presence of this group on the net

	aww shucks - just when i was getting reading to announce the
	successor to 2.10.1BSD too.  maybe i'll do it anyways.

	Steven M. Schultz
	sms@wlv.imsd.contel.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Oct17.181856.7859@lonex.radc.af.mil>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!voder!wlbr!lonex.radc.af.mil!sms

References: <1990Oct17.002046.2897@virtech.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!voder!wlbr!lonex.radc.af.mil!sms
From: sms@lonex.radc.af.mil (Steven M. Schultz)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.2bsd
Subject: Re: Hah!
Message-ID: <1990Oct17.181856.7859@lonex.radc.af.mil>
Date: 17 Oct 90 18:18:56 GMT
References: <1990Oct17.002046.2897@virtech.uucp>
Organization: RADC
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message