🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Oct17.165058.7580@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
} In article <1990Oct17.002046.2897@virtech.uucp> rickr@virtech.uucp (Rick Rodman) writes:
} >So, 2bsd is a dead product, and the presence of this group on the net
} >is an abuse of public money.
> 
> There are still people running it, so it's not dead yet.  And the only
> waste of money is by people posting to the group, i.e. you.  Its presence,
> without traffic, costs nothing.

Hah!  This topic has generated more traffic than comp.bugs.2bsd
has seen in a long time!  At least comp.sys.cbm keeps busy with
for-sale articles.

--
Dennis Flaherty              dennisf@ndcvx.cc.nd.edu
U of Notre Dame      Dept. of Electrical Engineering
  Notre Dame *tells* me what opinions to have.