Do all third party TMs interpret tmcs==0 as 1600BPI?

Thread View: comp.bugs.2bsd

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by casey Sun, 21 Aug 1988 02:22

#205

Author: casey
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 1988 02:22

22 lines
1609 bytes

  Ok all you PDP-11 gurus, get out your peripheral data books: DEC
produced a tape subsystem called a TM-11/TE-10, typically referred to by
UNIXers as a TM.  The DEC TM was only capable of 800BPI and under.

  Several third party manufactures have produced TM emulators capable of
1600BPI and even 6250BPI (AVIV only?).  2.9BSD, 4.3BSD, and several other
UNIX versions support these TM emulators.  Under 2.9 and 4.3, 060000 is
stuffed into tmcs for 800BPI (which puts a standard DEC TM into 800BPI
9-track mode), and a 0 is used for 1600BPI.  (4.3 uses a 020000 for
6250BPI for the AVIV.)

  I'm trying to get the 2.10BSD stand alone boot fixed up with better
support for 1600BPI - our only distribution density.  Will I get in
trouble if I have the stand alone primary boot stuff a zero into tmcs?
This would cause a DEC TM to go into 7-track ???BPI, but then a DEC TM
wouldn't be able to read in the primary bootstrap in any case ...

  As I understand it, most TM emulators ignore the 060000 bits in tmcs
entirely and use a physical switch on the drive to select density.

Casey

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads