🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <19095:Jan1916:41:3291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>In article <14902@celit.fps.com> billd@fps.com (Bill Davidson) writes:
>> #!/bin/sh
>> USERS=`who|sort|awk '{print $1}'`
>> echo $USERS
>
>Okay, timings: The perl version is about ten times as slow as the PD C
>version and the Berkeley C version. The shell script is about twice as
>slow as that. The perl version uses ten times as much memory as the C
>versions, and five times as much memory as the shell script.
>
>Now can someone give me one good reason that Berkeley should distribute
>the Perl or sh version rather than the C version?

No.  Not really.  I've always thought that "users" was a bit of a silly
program to have though.  I've always found "who" and "finger" to be
much more useful.

>30 lines of C code is hardly a maintenance problem

Agreed.  It would be nice if it worked properly though.

>and on a system with fifty undergraduates
>running automatic utmp checks every minute in the background, the
>difference between C and Perl is the difference between a 2% extra load
>and a 20% extra load.

Huh?  Your undergrads run "users" every minute?  REALLY????!!!!

Bizarre.

Would you explain this please?

--Bill Davidson