Article View: comp.bugs.misc
Article #64Re: diffs for ctime.c for new DST rules, v7 systems
From: dave
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1987 12:33
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1987 12:33
27 lines
1834 bytes
1834 bytes
In article <1151@ukecc.uky.csnet> edward@ukecc.UUCP (Edward C. Bennett) writes:
>In article <1565@lsuc.UUCP> dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) writes:
>> Below is a diff for /usr/src/libc/gen/ctime.c
>>for v7 systems
>
>I think we've all seen this coming, but shouldn't the writers of our
>respective flavors of UNIX be providing the fixes. I'm not knocking
>David's good intentions, but the DST switch can be viewed as a MAJOR
>software bug worthy of an OFFICIAL update.
Absolutely. But no-one ever maintained v7 systems very officially,
and I doubt anyone does now. By all means, if you have a UNIX
which is "supported" (say by H-P, DEC or AT&T), lean on your
suppliers to fix the problem.
Incidentally, what happens if you can't fix it? I suppose you
could simply set the clock (i.e., count of time in seconds) forward
an hour on April 5 and back on April 26. Then, as long as your
software is never fixed, all times reported will be apparently OK.
We have a CT MiniFrame running CTIX (Sys V), by the way. I've
assumed that for that system I may just hack TZ during the relevant
three weeks...
David Sherman
--
{ seismo!mnetor cbosgd!utcs watmath decvax!utcsri ihnp4!utzoo } !lsuc!dave
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1569@lsuc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!daveReferences:
<1565@lsuc.UUCP> <1151@ukecc.uky.csnet>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!dave From: dave@lsuc.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.bugs.misc Subject: Re: diffs for ctime.c for new DST rules, v7 systems Message-ID: <1569@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 11-Feb-87 07:33:36 EST Article-I.D.: lsuc.1569 Posted: Wed Feb 11 07:33:36 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Feb-87 20:47:10 EST References: <1565@lsuc.UUCP> <1151@ukecc.uky.csnet> Sender: dave@lsuc.UUCP Reply-To: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 27 Summary: official updates should certainly be used, if available