Re: s/A*./B/g editor bug?

Article View: comp.bugs.sys5

Article #114

#114

From: Guy Harris
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1989 17:24

5 lines
682 bytes

>Both also behave this way on SunOS 3.5, which is a 4.2 BSD derivative.
>Anyone care to try it out on a 2bsd or a V7 system?

"vi", but not "ed", behaves that way on SunOS 4.0, whose "vi" is
4.3BSD-derived and whose "ed" is S5R3-derived.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2549@auspex.auspex.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!auspex!guy

References: <3522@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> <741@ccssrv.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5,comp.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: s/A*./B/g editor bug?
Message-ID: <2549@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 19 Oct 89 17:24:59 GMT
References: <3522@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> <741@ccssrv.UUCP>
Reply-To: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message