Re: setuid(2) bug?

Article View: comp.bugs.sys5

Article #695

#695

From: bsteve
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1988 01:01

9 lines
702 bytes


The program gives the expected response on my 3b2 running SVR3.1. Could
this be a bug from a previous release or a bug in a particular vendor
kernel implementation?

  Steve Blasingame ihnp4!gorgo!bsteve (bsteve@gorgo.att.com)
  AT&T Itasca, Illinois
  (312) 250-5376

Technical Details

Message-ID: <143700001@occrsh.ATT.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!occrsh!occrsh.ATT.COM!bsteve

References: <679@rivm05.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!occrsh!occrsh.ATT.COM!bsteve
From: bsteve@occrsh.ATT.COM
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5
Subject: Re: setuid(2) bug?
Message-ID: <143700001@occrsh.ATT.COM>
Date: 23 Feb 88 01:01:00 GMT
References: <679@rivm05.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:rivm05.UUCP:-67900:occrsh.ATT.COM:143700001:000:269
Nf-From: occrsh.ATT.COM!bsteve    Feb 22 19:01:00 1988

Reply to Parent Message