Article View: comp.bugs.sys5
Article #700Re: A security hole
From: Gilles BERGER SABBATEL
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 1988 15:49
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 1988 15:49
20 lines
1338 bytes
1338 bytes
In article <181@wsccs.UUCP> terry@wsccs.UUCP (terry) writes: > > Do NOT write a setuid program that uses getcwd(). The getcwd() call >does a popen() of the "pwd" shell command and does not check it's path. This >means that someone could write their own pwd and execute the command from >their directory, thus gaining root access via a sh -c. I am not sure this is a real problem. As far as I know, pwd is built in the standard sys V shell. Whenever you try to execute pwd, the builtin command is executed, even if there is another pwd in your path. The only way to execute another pwd is to give explicitely its full pathname (ex: ./pwd), so I think that getcwd() is quite secure. Obviously, the problem could exist if /bin/sh were not the standard sys V shell. -- Gilles BERGER SABBATEL IMAG-TIM3/INPG, 46 Avenue Felix Viallet, F-38031 GRENOBLE CEDEX - FRANCE Tel: 76 47 98 55 Ext: 606 UUCP: ...!seismo!mcvax!inria!archi!berger or: berger@archi
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2613@imag.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!inria!imag!bergerReferences:
<181@wsccs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!inria!imag!berger From: berger@imag.UUCP (Gilles BERGER SABBATEL) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5 Subject: Re: A security hole Message-ID: <2613@imag.UUCP> Date: 29 Feb 88 15:49:33 GMT References: <181@wsccs.UUCP> Reply-To: berger@imag.UUCP (Gilles BERGER SABBATEL) Organization: IMAG, University of Grenoble, France Lines: 20