Article View: comp.bugs.sys5
Article #73Re: vi(1) bug - defunct processes
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 1989 15:41
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 1989 15:41
15 lines
1062 bytes
1062 bytes
In article <40648@sgi.SGI.COM>, vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes: > In article <14562@bfmny0.UUCP>, tneff@bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes: > > To heck with mailx(1), this is worse. > Ha! Nothing is worse than mailx(1), ... Sure. The version of mailx(1) that comes with the System-3 based Xenixes for Intel's 310/320 boxes. It's way worse. And then there's /bin/mail... -- Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-' "Optimization is not some mystical state of grace, it is an intricate act U of human labor which carries real costs and real risks." -- Tom Neff
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5796@ficc.uu.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peterReferences:
<14562@bfmny0.UUCP> <40648@sgi.SGI.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5 Subject: Re: vi(1) bug - defunct processes Message-ID: <5796@ficc.uu.net> Date: 20 Aug 89 15:41:01 GMT References: <14562@bfmny0.UUCP> <40648@sgi.SGI.COM> Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 15