Article View: comp.bugs.sys5
Article #813Re: regcmp(1)
From: Michael T Sullivan
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1988 19:35
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1988 19:35
16 lines
1117 bytes
1117 bytes
In article <539@olgb1.oliv.co.uk>, olapw@olgb1.oliv.co.uk (Tony Walton) writes:
>
> cpp run; this is shown by putting it in a .i file. You then #include the
> file in a .c file (the .h suffix is purely a convention, by the way). cpp is
> run on this .c file and the .i file is included.
I have had several letters along this line. But I also have had a letter or
two saying that some pre-processors will only #include files with the .h
suffix. Is this a rare occurence? I can definitely see why one may want to
put regcmp output into a .i file, but if not everybody can do it, is it still
a good idea?
--
Michael Sullivan {uunet|attmail}!vsi!sullivan
sullivan@vsi.com
V-Systems, Inc. Santa Ana, CA How about this, Dave?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<763@vsi.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!vsi!sullivanReferences:
<757@vsi.UUCP> <539@olgb1.oliv.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!vsi!sullivan From: sullivan@vsi.UUCP (Michael T Sullivan) Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5 Subject: Re: regcmp(1) Summary: Can everyone #include *.i? Message-ID: <763@vsi.UUCP> Date: 27 Jul 88 19:35:21 GMT References: <757@vsi.UUCP> <539@olgb1.oliv.co.uk> Distribution: comp Organization: V-Systems, Inc. -- Santa Ana, CA Lines: 16