🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

6 total messages Started by Geoff Kuenning Thu, 10 Mar 1988 07:47
Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#702
Author: Geoff Kuenning
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 1988 07:47
7 lines
810 bytes
While working on ispell (yes, it's coming, but not real soon) I stumbled
across a non-word in my /usr/dict/words file.  The verb form of
"accreditation" is "accredit," despite the best efforts of some people
to change it.  If you're a stickler for accuracy, like me, edit
/usr/dict/words to change that entry to "accreditation".
-- 
	Geoff Kuenning   geoff@ITcorp.com   {uunet,trwrb}!desint!geoff
Re: Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#703
Author: Andrew Burt
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1988 05:54
33 lines
1748 bytes
In article <1693@desint.UUCP> geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) writes:
>...I stumbled across a non-word in my /usr/dict/words file.

Brings to mind a word that showed up on a list of five letter palindromes
(no, I wasn't bored, I was making a handout about regular expressions
with ^\(.\)\(.\).\2\1$ as an example):

	rever

Now, I admit I did find it in the OED.  But that was the only dictionary
of mine that listed it (of about a half dozen).

If I saw this in a document I'd assume it was a misspelling of "revert" or
"revere", etc.; and spell allows "revers" as a plural, which probably
should be "reverse".

This brings up an interesting question:  Should /usr/dict/words list
words that are technically allowable (listed in some notable dictionary)
but are (a) very uncommon and (b) very close to likely misspellings of
far more common words -- at the expense of not catching what are
probably typos?  To my mind, a spelling checker should flag words that
are correct over omitting incorrect words.

I can't see "but it makes the dictionary complete" argument being used
since many common words (in a Unix environment) are missing, such as
"filename", "pathname", "stdin",...  (Maybe a -u(nix) option to spell is
in order... :-)

-- 

Andrew Burt 				   			isis!aburt

              Fight Denver's pollution:  Don't Breathe and Drive.
Re: Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#723
Author: BEATTIE
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 1988 00:00
6 lines
504 bytes

This machine accepts "sincerly" as correctly spelled when it should only
accept "sincerely".

Tombo.
Re: Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#735
Author: Geoff Kuenning
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1988 08:07
23 lines
1690 bytes
In article <1338@hoqax.UUCP> twb@hoqax.UUCP (BEATTIE) writes:

> This machine accepts "sincerly" as correctly spelled when it should only
> accept "sincerely".

This is because of the optimistic design of spell(1).  Spell has a list of
suffix rules, which it applies to all words indiscriminately.  A suffix
that only makes sense on a verb (e.g., -ment) will be applied to nouns,
adverbs, and adjectives as well.  Thus, for example, spell accepts
"sincerement" as well as "sincerly" (I just checked).

Ispell, by contrast, explicitly associates its suffixes with particular
roots, so it will reject both of these errors (again, I checked).  The
latest version of ispell is 2.0.02;  it's available (without a dictionary)
from the comp.sources.misc archives.  Don't hold your breath waiting for the
next posting;  it's coming but you'll match the sky before I get everything
together.

BTW, for anyone who cares, the original version of ispell was written
in 1971 (thanks to Ole Brinch Hansen for providing this tidbit).  17
years old!  Hell, some of its fans are younger than that!
-- 
	Geoff Kuenning   geoff@ITcorp.com   {uunet,trwrb}!desint!geoff
Re: Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#739
Author: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 1988 01:33
13 lines
1222 bytes
In article <1697@desint.UUCP> geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) writes:
-In article <1338@hoqax.UUCP> twb@hoqax.UUCP (BEATTIE) writes:
-> This machine accepts "sincerly" as correctly spelled when it should only
-> accept "sincerely".
-This is because of the optimistic design of spell(1).  Spell has a list of
-suffix rules, which it applies to all words indiscriminately.  A suffix
-that only makes sense on a verb (e.g., -ment) will be applied to nouns,
-adverbs, and adjectives as well.  Thus, for example, spell accepts
-"sincerement" as well as "sincerly" (I just checked).

Spell (at least the System V version) has a "stop list" that can be
tweaked to catch common errors such as "sincerly" that slip through
the net.  Not great, but it works.
Re: Non-word "accreditate" in /usr/dict/words
#731
Author: Andrey K. Yeatts
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1988 17:23
18 lines
1238 bytes
In article <1693@desint.UUCP>, geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) writes:
| While working on ispell (yes, it's coming, but not real soon) I stumbled
| across a non-word in my /usr/dict/words file.  The verb form of
| "accreditation" is "accredit," despite the best efforts of some people
| to change it.  If you're a stickler for accuracy, like me, edit
| /usr/dict/words to change that entry to "accreditation".

| 	Geoff Kuenning   geoff@ITcorp.com   {uunet,trwrb}!desint!geoff

or else add in one of my favorites: "orientate," if only for the
completifaction of verbiation of your lexilogical database.
(Excusify me for being in a non-linear mode of epistolization :=)

-- 
Andrey Yeatts					Dept. of Computer Science
andrey@arizona.edu				Univ. of Arizona
{allegra,cmcl2,ihnp4,noao}!arizona!andrey	Tucson, AZ 85710
						(602) 621-2858
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads