🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.client-server
2 messages
2 total messages Started by NightSeer Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:12
Win 2000 Server
#274
Author: NightSeer
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:12
14 lines
2391 bytes
    Hello everyone, I am not sure if this is the proper newsgroup, but I
work for a small architecture firm that is looking to upgrade our server.
At the moment we have NT Small business server 4.0.  I don't know everything
about this OS, but as we added some XP computers, they don't work well with
the server.  Is this something that can only be remedied by an upgrade to
Windows Server 2000 or 2003?  Also, would it be worthwhile to use 2000 or go
to 2003.  This is as basic as a server gets (and meets all the
requirements), and is only used as a file server and possibly a mail server
in the future, but the problems with XP and possibly getting newer laptops
with XP already installed, is making us consider an upgrade.  Any help would
be appreciated greatly.  Thank you.

-- 
Night_Seer
Re: Win 2000 Server
#273
Author: Clay
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:44
28 lines
2460 bytes
Hello
One question...what are the problems you are having with your XP
clients?
As per what OS to use, Win2000 or Win2003...If are are not planning a
major
implementation of servers running 2003, then stick with Win2000
server.
Since you mentioned that this server is used only for file serving,
then I would stay with 2000.
Are you running a WorkGroup or Domain?
How many PC's already exist in your network.
Keep in mind that in a Workgroup you can have up to 10 pc's utilizing
resources on that server.



"Night_Seer" <none> wrote in message news:<usCdnakyeZbAxaSiRVn-hg@speakeasy.net>...
> Hello everyone, I am not sure if this is the proper newsgroup, but I
> work for a small architecture firm that is looking to upgrade our server.
> At the moment we have NT Small business server 4.0.  I don't know everything
> about this OS, but as we added some XP computers, they don't work well with
> the server.  Is this something that can only be remedied by an upgrade to
> Windows Server 2000 or 2003?  Also, would it be worthwhile to use 2000 or go
> to 2003.  This is as basic as a server gets (and meets all the
> requirements), and is only used as a file server and possibly a mail server
> in the future, but the problems with XP and possibly getting newer laptops
> with XP already installed, is making us consider an upgrade.  Any help would
> be appreciated greatly.  Thank you.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads