Request for References on Task-Specifity

Article View: comp.cog-eng

Article #501

#501

From: Dennis McCarthy
Date: Tue, 05 May 1987 19:36

11 lines
1128 bytes

There seems to be a fundamental disagreement between linguists
and cognitive scientist over task-specific cognitive mechanisms
for language, particularly for language acquisition.  Linguists
generally assume such mechanisms.  However, recent proposals for
the architecture of cognition (e.g. ACT*, Soar) do not include
special mechanisms for language.  Their authors claim that all
cognitive functions, including language, are achieved by the
general mechanisms of their architectures.

Does anyone know of a book or article that contains an analysis
of the arguments for both points of view?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15743@cca.CCA.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cca!mccarthy

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cca!mccarthy
From: mccarthy@cca.CCA.COM (Dennis McCarthy)
Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng,sci.lang
Subject: Request for References on Task-Specifity
Message-ID: <15743@cca.CCA.COM>
Date: Tue, 5-May-87 15:36:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: cca.15743
Posted: Tue May  5 15:36:25 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 09:50:39 EDT
Organization: Computer Corp. of America, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 11
Keywords: Language Acquisition, Language Universals