🚀 go-pugleaf

My database is 250MB and I keep getting Unrecognized Database Errors all the
time.  It's a pain in the ass.

--

------------------------------------
Scott LaPointe
Internet Outlook Inc.
Tel: (506) 854-0211   Fax: (506) 854-0270
Web: http://www.ioi.nb.ca  Email: ioi@mon.auracom.com
Personal Web: http://www.ioi.nb.ca/scott  Email: scottl@mon.auracom.com


Joe "We are Borg" Foster <joe@bftsi0.UUCP> wrote in message
11029@bftsi0.UUCP...
>In article <35BFC453.3C37EE36@earthlink.net>, nutropetfood@earthlink.net
(NinkSink) writes:
>
>> Hello all.  A few questions about MS-Access '97 on a Pentium
>
>> Does anyone know a ball-park figure of the max size an MS-Access '97
database can become
>> before MS-Access applications have performance and/or data integrity
faults.  I would also
>
>I haven't noticed any particular limits, but I've been playing
>in the 512MB range in both Access 2.0 and '97 and have been
>fairly careful in applying patches and creating indexes to speed
>up my queries. If you can avoid table scans, you should be OK.
>The data integity problems I was having for a while disappeared
>completely once I replaced my SOHO 100TX ethernet card with one
>from Bay Networks, go figure!
>
>--
>Joe Foster <mailto:jfoster@ricochet.net> Spam is irrelevant. Assimilate
this:
><ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/index.txt> Microsoft's master patch list
><ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/mslfiles/> MS I got yer patch right here!
><http://www.microsoft.com/msdn/>            MS Knowledge Base & more
><http://www.dejanews.com/home_ps.shtml>     Usenet search and archival
engine
><http://www.altavista.digital.com>          WWW *and* Usenet search engine
>WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above        They're   coming
to
>because  my cats have  apparently  learned to type.        take me away, ha
ha!