Article View: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Article #1064Re: 100MBPS ENET
From: Rich Seifert
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:33
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:33
20 lines
1373 bytes
1373 bytes
In article <JAS.93Jan26145441@mcgarret.proteon>, jas@mcgarret.proteon (John A. Shriver) writes:
> Considering that the people doing this have set some ridiculous
> up-front requirements, like no change in frame format or size, they
> are already seriously curtailed in what they can acheive. 1500 bytes
> was too small a frame at 10 mbps, it will be ridiculous at 100 mbps.
> For high bits/second throughput, big frames are critical. The
> software overhead is mostly per frame, not per byte.
>
There have been no such requirements set by the study group. The group
has just barely begun to work on the OBJECTIVES for a standard.
I am sure that maximum frame size will be discussed.
--
Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting
seifert@netcom.com (408) 996-0922
(408) 996-2860 FAX
"... specialists in Local Area Networks and Data Communications systems"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.003350.14621@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!seifertReferences:
<3159366228.23@inode.com> <JAS.93Jan26145441@mcgarret.proteon>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!seifert From: seifert@netcom.com (Rich Seifert) Subject: Re: 100MBPS ENET Message-ID: <1993Jan27.003350.14621@netcom.com> Organization: Networks & Communications Consulting References: <3159366228.23@inode.com> <JAS.93Jan26145441@mcgarret.proteon> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:33:50 GMT Lines: 20