Article View: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Article #232Re: Can NFS over FDDI work properly?
From: Vernon Schryver
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 20:55
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 20:55
45 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
In article <mbt.717961736@Able.MKT.3Com.Com>, mbt@ESD.3Com.COM (Brad Turner) writes: > vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes: > ... > >That's a reasonable statement. Why does 3Com allow their boxes > >to do FDDI-ethernet bridging? When they drop 4K IP FDDI packets? > > Because in some instances it solves real customer problems. As a vendor > it is our challenge to educate/advise customers as to the pros and cons > of various methods of interconnecting networks and help them design > the best solution to fit their specific needs. In some instances > translation bridging is a valid solution. I understand that kind of pressure. There are always salescreatures who find multi-million dollar deals that the system (yours or mine) does not quiet fit. The salescritters I deal with never, and even some management often does not understand my concern that while doing the deal is good for this quarter's revenue numbers and this month's commission check, selling a bad solution now can prevent ever selling anything to that account again. Or even selling anything other accounts which have in future years hired someone who worked at the first account. I don't even try to convey my fear and loathing for the support hassles, arguments, and verbal abuse generated by such a bad fit. For a typical example, I have watched customers of fancy ethernet hubs decide network problems were the fault of the hubs, and refuse to ever deal with the vender again under any circumstances, even though the problems were not really caused by the hubs. There are several companies selling FDDI-ether bridges that do not work in the presense of real FDDI hosts using UDP. I continue to wonder what their customers think after they discover they have purchased bridges that work "some of the time for some traffic." No matter how great the bridge may be otherwise, do they ever deal with that vendor again? I know that I would be skeptical of any company that tried to sell me an FDDI-ether bridge that just dropped 4K UDP/IP/FDDI packets, because if the bridge vendor does not understand the importance of 4K FDDI packets and just tells me to "change the MTU", then the bridge vendor may not understand other, more important issues. Vernon Schryver, vjs@sgi.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qi5grog@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sgigate!odin!sgi!rhyolite!vjsReferences:
<1992Sep26.114942.15941@nuscc.nus.sg> <mbt.717961736@Able.MKT.3Com.Com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sgigate!odin!sgi!rhyolite!vjs From: vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.fddi Subject: Re: Can NFS over FDDI work properly? Keywords: NFS, FDDI Message-ID: <qi5grog@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> Date: 1 Oct 92 20:55:18 GMT References: <1992Sep26.114942.15941@nuscc.nus.sg> <mbt.717961736@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mountain View, CA Lines: 45