Re: using active hubs & FDDI

Article View: comp.dcom.lans.fddi

Article #26

Back to comp.dcom.lans.fddi Previous Next

#26

From: Tony Li
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1992 07:46

14 lines
941 bytes

In article <1992Aug1.073837.10426@e2big.mko.dec.com> pettengill@cvg.enet.dec.com () writes:
    
    Nit:
    
    The term used is `translating bridges'; bridges are by nature `transparent'.
    
Nit nit:

Translating bridges which do things like fragment IP packets are not
transparent.  Therefore, they're not bridges.  ;-)

-- 
Tony Li - Escapee from the USC Computer Science Department          tli@usc.edu
		       The net is not what it seems.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <l7n4m5INN35c@skat.usc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news

References: <1992Jul27.172641.22132@acc.com> <nrksjfc@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> <1992Aug1.073837.10426@e2big.mko.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news
From: tli@skat.usc.edu (Tony Li)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Subject: Re: using active hubs & FDDI
Date: 2 Aug 1992 00:46:13 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 14
Sender: tli@skat.usc.edu (Tony Li)
Message-ID: <l7n4m5INN35c@skat.usc.edu>
References: <1992Jul27.172641.22132@acc.com> <nrksjfc@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> <1992Aug1.073837.10426@e2big.mko.dec.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

Reply to Parent Message