Article View: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Article #264Re: How perform 30+ Workstation on FDDI?
From: pettengill
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 02:06
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 02:06
50 lines
2888 bytes
2888 bytes
In article <1992Oct10.131926.1@elgr.epfl.ch>, grandjean@elgr.epfl.ch writes: |> |> We are evaluating multiple ethernet segment vs FDDI. |> Assuming that you have reasonable adapters, FDDI will buy you a lot more than 10 Ethernet segments connected by a switch; figure that you only get 30 megabits out of your FDDI adapter (I'd call that a dog). If there is no contention, then you'll move data at 3 times the rate as you can on Ethernet. If there is contention, you get the same total data rate as if you had 10 Ethernet segments where the traffic was all local; but if the traffic is all going thru a switch and optimally balanced, then you'll need 20 Ethernet segments to get the same total thruput as a single FDDI segment. It's all simple queuing theory: a single k unit server is always better than k single unit servers. (Of course, the complex part of the theory is dealing with the bottlenecks that every system ends up with because life isn't as simple as theory needs life to be.) |>Does anyone have experience with 30+ networked workstations with FDDI? |>What are the issue on management and upgradability? I don't have experience with workstations, but in testing 10+ `servers' on FDDI, FDDI has its faults, ie., there is a lot more overhead than when using proprietary interconnects (CI, DSSI), but the performance is generally about equal and the flexibility and cost better. |>Is there somewhere on the NET performance figure of such configuration |>(DEC & SUN hardware)? There was an article in the DEC Technical Journal that focused on FDDI that reported on benchmarking the DECcontroller 700 on a DECstation 5000. However, unless you have easy access to this journal, I don't think its worth tracking down these days; it is getting rather dated. |> |>Thanks for anyone who can make the point clearer. |>-- |>Daniel Grandjean, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology __ __ |>Address: EPFL SI-DGR, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland | \/ | |>E-mail: grandjean@elgr.epfl.ch |o ()o _ |>Phone: +41 21 693 27 24 (Central European Time) |__/\__/ |>Fax: +41 21 693 27 27 __ |> mulp DEC - CVG cluster busters
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct14.020621.14513@e2big.mko.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!cvg.enet.dec.com!pettengillReferences:
<1992Oct10.131926.1@elgr.epfl.ch>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.fddi Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!cvg.enet.dec.com!pettengill From: pettengill@cvg.enet.dec.com () Subject: Re: How perform 30+ Workstation on FDDI? Message-ID: <1992Oct14.020621.14513@e2big.mko.dec.com> Lines: 50 Sender: guest@e2big.mko.dec.com (Guest (DECnet)) Reply-To: pettengill@cvg.enet.dec.com () Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1992Oct10.131926.1@elgr.epfl.ch> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 02:06:21 GMT