🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Article #267

Re: 10 byte fragments on fddi - a sign of trouble?

#267
From: Ron Perloff
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 00:22
24 lines
1438 bytes
In article <ON7T+38+F@linac.fnal.gov> crawdad@fncent (Matt Crawford) writes:
>While looking at one of our fddi rings I saw a fair number of 10 byte
>fragment frames which had just the initial frame code byte, a valid
>local destination address, and half of a source address.  Is this
>"normal"?

Yes! In FDDI networks, each source node is responsible
for stripping frames it has sent. If the node is not a
bridge, it recognizes frames it has stripped by seeing
its own MAC address in the source address field. Because
nodes must minimize latency, they have already retransmitted
the first several bytes of the frame before they have received
the complete source address field, so it is too late to
strip the entire frame. That is okay, however, because
MACs 'know' not to receive partial frames.

Ron

Ronald S. Perloff     rasp@xlnt.com
XLNT Designs, Inc.  (XDI)
15050 Avenue of Science
Suite 106
San Diego, CA  92128
619 487 9320   -   FAX: 619 487 9768
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1215@xlnt.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!network.ucsd.edu!sdcrsi!xlnt!xlnt.com
References: <ON7T+38+F@linac.fnal.gov>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!network.ucsd.edu!sdcrsi!xlnt!xlnt.com
From: rasp@xlnt.com (Ron Perloff)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Subject: Re: 10 byte fragments on fddi - a sign of trouble?
Message-ID: <1215@xlnt.COM>
Date: 6 Oct 92 00:22:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: xlnt.1215
References: <ON7T+38+F@linac.fnal.gov>
Sender: postmaster@xlnt.COM
Organization: xdi
Lines: 24