Article View: comp.dcom.lans.fddi
Article #273Re: Can NFS over FDDI work properly?
From: Brad Turner
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 22:32
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 22:32
46 lines
2766 bytes
2766 bytes
vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes: >In article <mbt.718307170@Able.MKT.3Com.Com>, mbt@ESD.3Com.COM (Brad Turner) writes: >> >I don't know about XNS or IPX, and I can't find any equivalent to the >IP offset or MF bits in the "Internet Protocol" described in my old >Xerox XNS documents. Ahhh now we are talking about the same thing, my basic point is that "you can't get there from here" within the context of bridging IPX or XNS from FDDI to ethernet. The primative building blocks that exist within IP that allow you to frag packets simply don't exist within the all other protocol suites. >The TCP sequence numbers have absolutely nothing to do with fragmenting >TCP/IP, UDP/IP, or any other current IP protocol. IP fragmenting is >done entirely within the IP datagram, and is based on the 8-byte >"offset" and the "more fragments" flag. You're correct, I'm mixing my layers here, but the basic point about not being able to fragment all protocols still hold true. >The only IP fragmenting that an FDDI-ether bridge will usually need to >do is of UDP packets. UDP packets are datagrams, and have no sequence >numbers of any kind. If you don't have FDDI-ether-FDDI networks, the >initial MSS negotiation in TCP will pick 1500. This is consistent with >the TCP/IP lore (and RFC) that considers fragmenting harmful. Hmmm what about bulk transfers (e.g. FTP, SMTP) that are TCP based? If a connection is to a local station (i.e. same net/subnet) won't the node attempt to use max size packets of the native media for the TCP connection? For example a FTP transfer from a FDDI station to an ethernet station that is bridged. Won't the FDDI node attempt to use max size FDDI frames for the transfer since the IP address of the destination is on the same net/subnet as the FDDI station? >Vernon Schryver, vjs@sgi.com -brad- -- v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Brad Turner | 5400 Bayfront Plaza | Marketing Engineer | (408) 764-5261 3Com Corp. | Santa Clara CA, 95052| mbt@NSD.3Com.Com | (408) 764-5002 fax
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mbt.718324346@Able.MKT.3Com.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news!usc!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!bridge2!Able.MKT.3Com.Com!mbtReferences:
<1992Sep26.114942.15941@nuscc.nus.sg> <mbt.718307170@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> <qncmi00@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news!usc!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!bridge2!Able.MKT.3Com.Com!mbt From: mbt@ESD.3Com.COM (Brad Turner) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.fddi Subject: Re: Can NFS over FDDI work properly? Keywords: NFS, FDDI Message-ID: <mbt.718324346@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> Date: 5 Oct 92 22:32:26 GMT References: <1992Sep26.114942.15941@nuscc.nus.sg> <mbt.718307170@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> <qncmi00@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> Sender: news@bridge2.NSD.3Com.COM Lines: 46 Nntp-Posting-Host: able.mkt.3com.com