🚀 go-pugleaf

Lee MacMillan wrote:
> 
> I'm curious as to how you determine email losses.  I'm new to @home and
> other than some problems 2 weekends ago, my email seems to be OK.
> 
> Lee
> Mike Blackford <mblackford@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:3A751633.202FC4A@spamcop.net...
> > I've updated my analysis of @Home email losses that I've been tracking
> > since July 4, 2000. It can be seen at
> > http://members.home.com/mblackford/eGroup-chart.htm
> >
> > The detailed log is at: http://members.home.com/mblackford/eGroup.htm
> >
> > For the last month, I've logged incoming email losses over 15%.  Needless
> > to say, the abysmal performance of @Home's email 'service' has continued
> > to deteriorate despite repeated assurances over the last six months or
> > more that "we're working on it", "the problem is fixed", and a variety of
> > other misrepresentations.

See http://members.home.net/mblackford/eGroup-overview.htm and the notes
at the beginning of  http://members.home.com/mblackford/eGroup.htm

-- 
~~~~~~~~ "Fish will be the last to discover water."  (Einstein) ~~~~~~~~
Zvxr Oynpxsbeq       Fvyvpba Inyyrl, Pnyvsbeavn       zvxr@oynpxsbeq.pbz