🚀 go-pugleaf

In comp.dcom.modems.cable Dima Volodin <dvv@dvv.org> wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:

>> To counter your data sample of one, let me point out 18,768 data
>> samples from rss from Jun 5th, 2000 that were also in ORBS.  I am led
>> to believe that all of these in fact were directly associated with
>> spam.  Can you provide any data to counter this data?

> How about - out of 65536 addresses of that RR block I was writing about
> only 598 allow connections to port 25 from the outside, and none of
> these addresses is either on RBL or RSS.

Wow: None.  Now *that's* an impressive number.

 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.19.227>  (Aug 14)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.31.247>  (May 22)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.45.250>  (Jul 28) 
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.83.212>  (Oct 17)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.83.215>  (Jun 10) 
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.196.24>  (Dec 26) 
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.198.38>  (Jul 14)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.202.16>  (Oct 30)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.202.28>  (Aug 01)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.204.19>  (May 05)
 <http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?204.210.223.18>  (Sep 09)

-- 
Bill "there goes the neighborhood" Maloy (brm4)