🚀 go-pugleaf

newhouse at rockhead dot com writes:
>In article <7c11uj$5bj$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com>,
>	gerg@shell1.ncal.verio.com (Greg Andrews) writes:
>> newhouse@nospam.crap (Paul Newhouse) writes:
>>>In article <abuse-0703992323400001@bovine.ati.com>,
>>>	abuse@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
>>> 
>>>> But up to now, it was not a real issue. Relatively slow connections
>>>> provided a natural data flow limitation. With more and more customers
>>>
>>>"Relatively slow connections" created a "natural" data flow?  So "relatively"
>>>faster connections are unnatural?  What comes from these unnatural data flows?
>>>Obviously the data gods never intended for us to go any faster than 30cps so 
>>>I guess we've been in trouble for a while now ... huh!!
>>>
>> 
>> Reading comprehension, Paul.  He said "...a natural data flow *limitation*."
>
>Are you suggesting that relatively fast connections will provide a natural
>data flow UNlimitation?
>

Why, 42, of course.

Now, if you'd care to ask the question using reasonably decent english
grammar, I'll be happy to give my answer.

  -Greg