Re: Calif ADSL should spur Cablemodem quality

Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable

Article #293

Back to comp.dcom.modems.cable Previous Next

#293

From: Eric Edwards
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 00:00

11 lines
1308 bytes

On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 02:42:16 GMT, Fred Goodwin, CMA <fgoodwin@eden.com> wrote:
>So, it's OK for AT&T to own the pipe and require you to subscribe to their 
>ISP, but it *isn't* OK for SBC to own *it's* pipe while letting you choose 
>your own ISP?

The big factor is practicality.  How are you supposed to provide access
to multiple ISP's with a cable modem architecture?  

-- 
Real courtesy requires human effort and understanding.  
Never let your machine or your habit send courtesy copies.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <slrn7a8f78.n0g.ese002@spica.exile.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<andrysF5r2uu.Mo4@netcom.com> <36a68279.4350824@news.ricochet.net> <MPG.110d538b8d5a37e39897a2@ispnews.walltech.com> <780re8$3mc_002@news.eden.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fa874,8f33dde60826a03f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public
X-Google-Thread: 113850,8f33dde60826a03f
X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public
From: ese002@news9.exile.org (Eric Edwards)
Subject: Re: Calif ADSL should spur Cablemodem quality
Date: 1999/01/19
Message-ID: <slrn7a8f78.n0g.ese002@spica.exile.org>
X-Deja-AN: 434334957
References: <andrysF5r2uu.Mo4@netcom.com> <36a68279.4350824@news.ricochet.net> <MPG.110d538b8d5a37e39897a2@ispnews.walltech.com> <780re8$3mc_002@news.eden.com>
X-Complaints-To: news@news9.exile.org
X-Trace: spica.exile.org 916733161 24190 127.0.0.1 (19 Jan 1999 08:06:01 GMT)
Organization: Engineers in Exile
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jan 1999 08:06:01 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,ba.internet

Reply to Parent Message