Re: Calif ADSL should spur Cablemodem quality

Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable

Article #296

Back to comp.dcom.modems.cable Previous Next

#296

From: Fred Goodwin, CMA
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 00:00

12 lines
1317 bytes

In article <slrn7a8f78.n0g.ese002@spica.exile.org>, ese002@news9.exile.org (Eric Edwards) wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 02:42:16 GMT, Fred Goodwin, CMA <fgoodwin@eden.com> wrote:
>>So, it's OK for AT&T to own the pipe and require you to subscribe to their 
>>ISP, but it *isn't* OK for SBC to own *it's* pipe while letting you choose 
>>your own ISP?
>
>The big factor is practicality.  How are you supposed to provide access
>to multiple ISP's with a cable modem architecture?

That's a good question -- I have no idea.  But telco complaints about 
"practicality" have never stopped the FCC from imposing regulatory 
requirements on the them.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7827i6$i0h6_002@tri.sbc.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<andrysF5r2uu.Mo4@netcom.com> <36a68279.4350824@news.ricochet.net> <MPG.110d538b8d5a37e39897a2@ispnews.walltech.com> <780re8$3mc_002@news.eden.com> <slrn7a8f78.n0g.ese002@spica.exile.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 113850,8f33dde60826a03f
X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public
X-Google-Thread: fa874,8f33dde60826a03f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public
From: fgoodwin@eden.com (Fred Goodwin, CMA)
Subject: Re: Calif ADSL should spur Cablemodem quality
Date: 1999/01/19
Message-ID: <7827i6$i0h6_002@tri.sbc.com>
X-Deja-AN: 434431845
References: <andrysF5r2uu.Mo4@netcom.com> <36a68279.4350824@news.ricochet.net> <MPG.110d538b8d5a37e39897a2@ispnews.walltech.com> <780re8$3mc_002@news.eden.com> <slrn7a8f78.n0g.ese002@spica.exile.org>
Organization: AMICI Online
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,ba.internet

Reply to Parent Message