Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #506Re: cable guy "vapor"-izes DSL 3X cable TV troll!
From: John Navas
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:12
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:12
32 lines
3123 bytes
3123 bytes
[POSTED TO comp.dcom.modems.cable; PLEASE REPLY THERE]
In <3A7B7FD3.9ABE0395@ufl.edu>, "Randy S." <rswitt@ufl.edu> wrote:
>> So, a couple of kids on a "segment" using Napster for instance, downloading a few tunes
>> and at the same time other users gettting tunes from them, could really slow or "kill"
>> that whole segment for all that are on it. Right?
>
>Well, let's see, I believe a cable segment supports 54 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload
>typically (I believe that they can vary this by how many channels they dedicate to
>delivery, I think there is 27 Mpbs down and 10 Mbps up per channel) . If a segment has say
>270 users on it (assuming a 100:1 oversubscription ratio that John used as typical for DSL
>earlier), each capped at 2 Mbps download, 384 Kbps upload (I think that's typical?) it
>would take 20,000 / 384 = 52 users uploading at maximum rate to saturate the upstream
>stream. Of course since many other people are ALSO uploading at normal rates, the real
>number would be somewhat lower. Realistically, I would say 25-35 people uploading
>aggressively would effectively "kill" the segment. Does that sound right, John?
I think the number needed to "kill" the segment is typically much lower,
perhaps as few as 5-10 -- see my own analysis in
<news:%oXe6.200$Tf1.8852@typhoon.sonic.net>.
>The
>kicker here is that this would happen even if they were all just uploading files to others
>on the same segment!
True.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
CABLE MODEM/DSL GUIDE: <http://Cable-DSL.home.att.net/>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kSXe6.204$Tf1.9002@typhoon.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!xfer10.netnews.com!netnews.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A64B680.2A79F24D@erols.com> <3A76B6CA.73B36B26@mynetwatchman.com> <4OGd6.100$mW6.5202@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A776B57.C495242C@mynetwatchman.com> <R3Ld6.144$mW6.6010@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A782325.2538A5E2@mynetwatchman.com> <diEe6.142$Tf1.5347@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A7B357B.3C2C1C79@ufl.edu> <S4Ke6.163$Tf1.6485@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A7B76D4.AA1FFC9F@ufl.edu> <4UKe6.5359$MA5.130255@news2.atl> <3A7B7FD3.9ABE0395@ufl.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1122a6,2145df83169cbbc6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1122a6,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,916316de6f72ceb X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-03 10:12:33 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!xfer10.netnews.com!netnews.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter@navasgrp.dublin.ca.us> Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,bellsouth.net.support.adsl Subject: Re: cable guy "vapor"-izes DSL 3X cable TV troll! Organization: The Navas Group, Dublin, CA, USA References: <3A64B680.2A79F24D@erols.com> <3A76B6CA.73B36B26@mynetwatchman.com> <4OGd6.100$mW6.5202@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A776B57.C495242C@mynetwatchman.com> <R3Ld6.144$mW6.6010@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A782325.2538A5E2@mynetwatchman.com> <diEe6.142$Tf1.5347@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A7B357B.3C2C1C79@ufl.edu> <S4Ke6.163$Tf1.6485@typhoon.sonic.net> <3A7B76D4.AA1FFC9F@ufl.edu> <4UKe6.5359$MA5.130255@news2.atl> <3A7B7FD3.9ABE0395@ufl.edu> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 32 Message-ID: <kSXe6.204$Tf1.9002@typhoon.sonic.net> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:12:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.185.87 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net X-Trace: typhoon.sonic.net 981223952 209.204.185.87 (Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:12:32 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:12:32 PST