🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #535

Re: New cox cable managed network

#535
From: Derek M. Loseke
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:53
253 lines
10035 bytes
Not that skilled help is necessarily hard to find here, but why on earth
would anyone who knows any better want to be installing cable modems for $10
an hour working in the weather year round when you could be making over
$30,000 a year to start by, in some cases, doing near nothing.

And as I said before, techs don't need to know the difference.  All they do
now is plug in and install the software, per Cox Communications Standard
Operating Procedure.

Derek




"PC Medic" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:jQxa8.2975$SJ3.111671@news1.east.cox.net...
>
> "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3%Z98.7525$zb.402885@news1.east.cox.net...
> > Sorry.  I guess I just live in a world (Windows 2000) where the Netbios
> name
> > is usually the same as the DNS, with the exception of the DNS suffix.
>
> Not so
>
> >
> > Also, your typical contractor doesn't need the know the difference
between
> > DNS and NetBIOS.  I personally guarantee that 75% of Cox Field Techs
> > installing CHSI don't.
> >
>
> Appears you are in an area where "skilled" help is hard to find!
>
> >
> >
> > "Arthur Hagen" <art@broomstick.com> wrote in message
> > news:y3U68.8160$Xk4.436368@news1.east.cox.net...
> > >
> > > "PC Medic" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message
> > > news:ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net...
> > > > Actually Cox@Home did use a MAC address, that of the modem, just as
> Cox
> > > > continues to do now on their own network. Also, the NetBios name and
> DNS
> > > > names are two different things, and while @Home used the computer
name
> > for
> > > > IP assigning the new Cox managed network does not.
> > > >
> > > > Cox Contractor???????
> > >
> > > It's not very assuring when they hire contractors who can't tell
NetBIOS
> > and
> > > DNS apart (and gets a few other things plain wrong too).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > *Art
> > >
> > > > "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net...
> > > > > Actually, @Home didn't use MAC Addresses, at least on on the Cox
> > > network.
> > > > > For Cox, they used the NetBios (DNS) Name to reserve IP Addresses.
> > The
> > > > MAC
> > > > > address had nothing to do with it on the Cox network, and I
imagine
> > that
> > > > is
> > > > > also true for Comcast and AT&T.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, the software doesn't detect all NIC's.  It has nothing to do
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > Modem.  However, we do have some problems with the old CyberSurf
> > modems.
> > > > > They should work however.  As long as your modem comes online,
> > > everything
> > > > is
> > > > > cool.  As for the software, it doesn't make a diference....you
don't
> > > need
> > > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Derek
> > > > > Cox Contractor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Suellen" <Suellen_Stewart@msn.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > I'm fairly certain that the migration had taken place, because I
> > > > > > initially did receive an IP address in the 68.xxx.xxx.xxx range,
> > > > > > before it reverted back to the old one in the 65.xxx.xxx.xxx
> range.
> > > > > > Whatever the explanation was, I have reverted to the correct
> > settings
> > > > > > (using DHCP)and everything is working for now. I am interested
in
> > your
> > > > > > statement that they "had to do something on their end." I know
> that
> > > > > > @home had a setup that required you to register the mac address
of
> a
> > > > > > new adapter if you changed your hardware, but that cox is not
> > supposed
> > > > > > to be set up that way. That seems to be confirmed by the fact
that
> I
> > > > > > can switch my laptop for the desktop that's normally attached to
> the
> > > > > > cable modem, and it will work. HOWEVER - tonight I tried to help
a
> > > > > > friend set up the same way. I did the conversion on her old
> > computer,
> > > > > > and that went fine. Then I tried to substitute her new Dell
> Inspiron
> > > > > > laptop for the old desktop, and the Cox software kept insisting
> that
> > > > > > it couldn't detect a NIC. This in spite of the fact that all the
> > modem
> > > > > > lights were flashing, ipconfig showed a good IP address and
> gateway,
> > > > > > and the status box for her NIC (in Windows XP) showed a good bit
> of
> > > > > > data being sent and received. I never did the browser and email
> > > > > > working. Tried to call tech support and see if they needed to
> change
> > > > > > something, but no luck getting through. I'm also wondering
whether
> > the
> > > > > > surfboard modem she's renting from Cox is compatible with
Windows
> > XP.
> > > > > > It looks pretty old - you can't even read a model number on it.
> Any
> > > > > > suggestions would be appreciated, since getting through to Cox
> Tech
> > > > > > Support seems about impossible right now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Martin J Piraino" <martinjp@cox.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:<m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net>...
> > > > > > > I wonder if your area had converted over to the new network
yet,
> > if
> > > > not
> > > > > then
> > > > > > > there wasn't a problem. Just  because you install the software
> > > doesn't
> > > > > mean
> > > > > > > your IP address will change immediately, mine didn't. I
wondered
> > the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > thing after I installed the software and called to ask about
it,
> > > they
> > > > > told
> > > > > > > me that the migration to the cox.net backbone wouldn't take
> place
> > > till
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > friday night in my area. I'd recieved the conversion kit and
> > > installed
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > that monday. If you keep the settings the way you have them
now
> > you
> > > > may
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > problems in the future.  I'd just leave it to DHCP, and obtain
> IP
> > > > > address
> > > > > > > automatically and remove proxys from the web browser.  You
said
> > you
> > > > got
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > new IP address after converting, was it on the 68.XXX.XXX.XXX
or
> > > > > > > 24.XXX.XXX.XXX? I had problems where for about a day I kept
> > getting
> > > an
> > > > > IP
> > > > > > > address in the private IP range of 169.XXX.XXX.XXX or
> > 10.XXX.XXX.XXX
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > annoyed me because I was getting the DNS numbers for cox.net
> right
> > > but
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > IP refused to change to one where I would have a net
connection.
> I
> > > > > finally
> > > > > > > called them and they did something to fix it on their end
> because
> > > when
> > > > I
> > > > > > > rebooted it was again a 68.XXX.XXX.XXX address.. one that I've
> had
> > > > since
> > > > > > > that time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Suellen" <Suellen_Stewart@msn.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > > Lloyd,
> > > > > > > > I wonder if you can give me a clue as to what happened in
this
> > > case:
> > > > I
> > > > > > > > followed Cox's "migration" instructions, used the CD and
> loaded
> > > the
> > > > > > > > software. Once everything was working, I uninstalled all the
> Cox
> > > > > > > > software. The next time I rebooted there was no connection,
> and
> > > > > > > > ipconfig revealed that I was set back to my old @home ip
> > address.
> > > I
> > > > > > > > manually entered the new ip address and gateway (that I had
> > > received
> > > > > > > > after converting) in the "alternate" tab in tcp/ip
properties,
> > and
> > > > > > > > regained the connection. It's been good for about 12 hours
> now,
> > > but
> > > > > > > > I'm wondering how long this will last considering ip
addresses
> > are
> > > > > > > > supposed to expire every four hours with the Cox system. . .
> > > (using
> > > > > > > > Windows XP).
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any info. you can provide!
> > > > > > > > Suellen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ShIa8.4164$SJ3.170583@news1.east.cox.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!hub1.nntpserver.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <y3U68.8160$Xk4.436368@news1.east.cox.net> <3%Z98.7525$zb.402885@news1.east.cox.net> <jQxa8.2975$SJ3.111671@news1.east.cox.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f392,a7865c87070b0fcc
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f392,public
X-Google-Thread: 1136e3,710aa4d82544bdbb
X-Google-Attributes: gid1136e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 113850,a7865c87070b0fcc
X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-13 22:35:16 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!hub1.nntpserver.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,cableinet.cable_modems,cox.internet.discussion.athomeconversion
References: <I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <y3U68.8160$Xk4.436368@news1.east.cox.net> <3%Z98.7525$zb.402885@news1.east.cox.net> <jQxa8.2975$SJ3.111671@news1.east.cox.net>
Subject: Re: New cox cable managed network
Lines: 255
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <ShIa8.4164$SJ3.170583@news1.east.cox.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:53:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.13.20.92
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.east.cox.net 1013666034 68.13.20.92 (Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:53:54 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:53:54 EST
Organization: Cox Communications