Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #576Re: New cox cable managed network
From: Derek M. Loseke
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:51
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:51
167 lines
8042 bytes
8042 bytes
The outlet can be added by either. Most of the time, it is added by the CHSI tech, unless a wall fish is required, in which case the outlet is added by a tech (contractor in Omaha) to fish the wire, and a broadband tech does the install. Actually, there is exception if there is a flush mount meter, and no way to ground inside if the interior is finished. However, you can ground to a piece of conduit if it is proven as grounded. It that doens't work, there is cold water, though cold water is often not a good enough ground. And there is always a ground rod, 5/8" x 8' into the ground. However, there are more specifics to all of these, as mandated by FCC regulations and the National Electric Code. Actually, I am having a problem with my Windows XP not agreeing with my motherboard chipset and my Promise 100. Therefore, I can only access when I have the time to tinker with it. Derek "PC Medic" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message news:togb8.10414$SJ3.375194@news1.east.cox.net... > > "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> wrote in message > news:JK1b8.8244$SJ3.286841@news1.east.cox.net... > > As you can see as Mr. Hobbs has said, there is much more work than > plugging > > it in. According to Standard Operating Procedure, the drop is to be of a > > newer style we are now using, that has a small pair or wires on the side. > > This is often used to telephony. Many times a jack needs to be added, and > > that is most of the time run on the outside of the house. > > And when needed, should have been added by a cable tech, not a broadband > tech. > That is SOP. > > > The drop is to be > > located to the power meter for proper grounding, and a wire should be run > to > > there from the existing house box, or old drop that is spliced. Though I > > have find many times that SOP is not followed, it is ALWAYS supposed to > be, > > with special exception in cases where grouding is not always possible to > the > > meter. The drop is always to follow power, meaning that it is to hang > > paralled with it, from the same pole, to the same place at the house. > Even > > in cases of an underground drop, it is to either be relocated to the > power > > meter by means of laying a temp drop to be buried at a later date, or > > splicing the drop if it is good, and running it to the power meter for > > proper grounding. > > Required by law in most areas so there is no "special exception" > > > > > As for the software, everything is fully DHCP. DNS servers IP, gateway > IP, > > subnet mask, machine IP, email settings, proxy settings, newsgroup > settings, > > and the like is all taken care of by the software. > > Nope, it is not handled by the software. > And what do you suppose this unskilled tech will do when arriving at a home > where NO networking enviroment is even installed on the PC? Or he put's this > magic CD you refer to in and things don't go as planned? Is it than SOP to > say, "sorry, the CD failed on your system so you don't get broadband > internet because I am clueless!" > > > The current exception to > > this is when converting a user from dialup or another HSI service, there > are > > often times residual setting in Outlook to old email accounts that cannot > be > > accessed through our system, so yes, sometimes some things need to be set > > manually, but the main purpose of the software is to eliminate the need > for > > the installers. The idea is that a customer can take a modem home, plug > it > > in, install the software, and they're up and running. There will of > course > > be some techs around to troubleshoot failed self installs, and do installs > > for people who don't trust their own installations skills, but the purpose > > of the software is the eliminate the wasted payroll that techs use up for > > installs that the customer can do themselves. > > > > It seems that you do not have knowledge of the Cox software quite as well > as > > the average installer, or computer junkie. However, you do appear the > know > > the basics from a books point of view, and you may have some knowledge in > a > > practical point of view, but it has not been demonstrated as so here just > > yet. > > Now, at this point you may want to ask who helped make possiblle the > "Advanced Users Click Here" option which appeared on the support site. I am > much more knowledgeable about the CD than you think. By the way, are the UBR > and NetScreen issues resolved in your area? > > > > > However, if you wish the further pursue this trivial online argument about > > factual information (not opinion), I will continue to do so at my > > opportunity. > > > As soon as you have opportunity to get the facts I would imagine. > Perhaps after your DNS and NetBIOS naming classes :) > > > > > > > "Jack Hobbs" <jhobbs1@cox.net> wrote in message > > news:S4Ra8.6327$SJ3.221438@news1.east.cox.net... > > > My house is 28 years old. The Cox installers pulled new cable from the > > > pedestal to my house, then new cable through the attic, down to the > modem. > > > The weather wasn't California billboard quality- I felt a bit sorry for > > > them. > > > > > > "PC Medic" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > > > news:nnPa8.6168$SJ3.212179@news1.east.cox.net... > > > > > > > > "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> wrote in message > > > > news:ShIa8.4164$SJ3.170583@news1.east.cox.net... > > > > > Not that skilled help is necessarily hard to find here, but why on > > earth > > > > > would anyone who knows any better want to be installing cable modems > > for > > > > $10 > > > > > an hour working in the weather year round when you could be making > > over > > > > > $30,000 a year to start by, in some cases, doing near nothing. > > > > > > > > "Working in the weather all year round"?? Just how many outdoor cable > > > modems > > > > have you had to install? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Qube8.7342$jC3.265435@news1.east.cox.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeeds-atl2!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <y3U68.8160$Xk4.436368@news1.east.cox.net> <3%Z98.7525$zb.402885@news1.east.cox.net> <jQxa8.2975$SJ3.111671@news1.east.cox.net> <ShIa8.4164$SJ3.170583@news1.east.cox.net> <nnPa8.6168$SJ3.212179@news1.east.cox.net> <S4Ra8.6327$SJ3.221438@news1.east.cox.net> <JK1b8.8244$SJ3.286841@news1.east.cox.net> <togb8.10414$SJ3.375194@news1.east.cox.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 113850,a7865c87070b0fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-Thread: 1136e3,710aa4d82544bdbb X-Google-Attributes: gid1136e3,public X-Google-Thread: 10f392,a7865c87070b0fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid10f392,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-24 11:51:18 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeeds-atl2!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,cableinet.cable_modems,cox.internet.discussion.athomeconversion References: <I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <y3U68.8160$Xk4.436368@news1.east.cox.net> <3%Z98.7525$zb.402885@news1.east.cox.net> <jQxa8.2975$SJ3.111671@news1.east.cox.net> <ShIa8.4164$SJ3.170583@news1.east.cox.net> <nnPa8.6168$SJ3.212179@news1.east.cox.net> <S4Ra8.6327$SJ3.221438@news1.east.cox.net> <JK1b8.8244$SJ3.286841@news1.east.cox.net> <togb8.10414$SJ3.375194@news1.east.cox.net> Subject: Re: New cox cable managed network Lines: 169 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <Qube8.7342$jC3.265435@news1.east.cox.net> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:51:12 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.13.20.92 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news1.east.cox.net 1014580272 68.13.20.92 (Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:51:12 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:51:12 EST Organization: Cox Communications