Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #579Re: New cox cable managed network
From: Derek M. Loseke
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:34
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:34
213 lines
9254 bytes
9254 bytes
Actually, I believe you may be correct. I think all the modems, when inventoried, have the MAC and corresponding Serial Number entered into the Cox system. When a dispatcher provisions a modem, it is done so with the serial number on the majority of modems. However, it wouldn't suprise me if that serial number isn't linked to a database the finds the Serial number and corresponding MAC, and is provisioned that way. For the user interface, the Serial number is used, but the MAC my be used on the machine level. Derek "Brian" <bswindle@charter.net> wrote in message news:3C68ACEB.D7846525@charter.net... > The MAC address is what the modem is provisioned by, not the serial number. > The server never sees any indication of a modem's serial number at any time. > Serial numbers may be recorded on work orders, but I would imagine they are tied > back to the MAC when put on an account. > > "Derek M. Loseke" wrote: > > > They didn't use the MAC address, except on certain modems. This doesn't > > include Motorola and Toshiba. They instead use the serial number. > > > > Why do you question the "Cox Contractor" part? I am a contractor for Cox. > > > > Derek > > > > "PC Medic" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > > news:ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net... > > > Actually Cox@Home did use a MAC address, that of the modem, just as Cox > > > continues to do now on their own network. Also, the NetBios name and DNS > > > names are two different things, and while @Home used the computer name for > > > IP assigning the new Cox managed network does not. > > > > > > Cox Contractor??????? > > > > > > > > > "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> wrote in message > > > news:dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net... > > > > Actually, @Home didn't use MAC Addresses, at least on on the Cox > > network. > > > > For Cox, they used the NetBios (DNS) Name to reserve IP Addresses. The > > > MAC > > > > address had nothing to do with it on the Cox network, and I imagine that > > > is > > > > also true for Comcast and AT&T. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, the software doesn't detect all NIC's. It has nothing to do with > > > the > > > > Modem. However, we do have some problems with the old CyberSurf modems. > > > > They should work however. As long as your modem comes online, > > everything > > > is > > > > cool. As for the software, it doesn't make a diference....you don't > > need > > > > it. > > > > > > > > Derek > > > > Cox Contractor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Suellen" <Suellen_Stewart@msn.com> wrote in message > > > > news:bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com... > > > > > I'm fairly certain that the migration had taken place, because I > > > > > initially did receive an IP address in the 68.xxx.xxx.xxx range, > > > > > before it reverted back to the old one in the 65.xxx.xxx.xxx range. > > > > > Whatever the explanation was, I have reverted to the correct settings > > > > > (using DHCP)and everything is working for now. I am interested in your > > > > > statement that they "had to do something on their end." I know that > > > > > @home had a setup that required you to register the mac address of a > > > > > new adapter if you changed your hardware, but that cox is not supposed > > > > > to be set up that way. That seems to be confirmed by the fact that I > > > > > can switch my laptop for the desktop that's normally attached to the > > > > > cable modem, and it will work. HOWEVER - tonight I tried to help a > > > > > friend set up the same way. I did the conversion on her old computer, > > > > > and that went fine. Then I tried to substitute her new Dell Inspiron > > > > > laptop for the old desktop, and the Cox software kept insisting that > > > > > it couldn't detect a NIC. This in spite of the fact that all the modem > > > > > lights were flashing, ipconfig showed a good IP address and gateway, > > > > > and the status box for her NIC (in Windows XP) showed a good bit of > > > > > data being sent and received. I never did the browser and email > > > > > working. Tried to call tech support and see if they needed to change > > > > > something, but no luck getting through. I'm also wondering whether the > > > > > surfboard modem she's renting from Cox is compatible with Windows XP. > > > > > It looks pretty old - you can't even read a model number on it. Any > > > > > suggestions would be appreciated, since getting through to Cox Tech > > > > > Support seems about impossible right now. > > > > > > > > > > "Martin J Piraino" <martinjp@cox.net> wrote in message > > > > news:<m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net>... > > > > > > I wonder if your area had converted over to the new network yet, if > > > not > > > > then > > > > > > there wasn't a problem. Just because you install the software > > doesn't > > > > mean > > > > > > your IP address will change immediately, mine didn't. I wondered the > > > > same > > > > > > thing after I installed the software and called to ask about it, > > they > > > > told > > > > > > me that the migration to the cox.net backbone wouldn't take place > > till > > > > that > > > > > > friday night in my area. I'd recieved the conversion kit and > > installed > > > > it > > > > > > that monday. If you keep the settings the way you have them now you > > > may > > > > have > > > > > > problems in the future. I'd just leave it to DHCP, and obtain IP > > > > address > > > > > > automatically and remove proxys from the web browser. You said you > > > got > > > > a > > > > > > new IP address after converting, was it on the 68.XXX.XXX.XXX or > > > > > > 24.XXX.XXX.XXX? I had problems where for about a day I kept getting > > an > > > > IP > > > > > > address in the private IP range of 169.XXX.XXX.XXX or 10.XXX.XXX.XXX > > > > which > > > > > > annoyed me because I was getting the DNS numbers for cox.net right > > but > > > > the > > > > > > IP refused to change to one where I would have a net connection. I > > > > finally > > > > > > called them and they did something to fix it on their end because > > when > > > I > > > > > > rebooted it was again a 68.XXX.XXX.XXX address.. one that I've had > > > since > > > > > > that time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Suellen" <Suellen_Stewart@msn.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com... > > > > > > > Lloyd, > > > > > > > I wonder if you can give me a clue as to what happened in this > > case: > > > I > > > > > > > followed Cox's "migration" instructions, used the CD and loaded > > the > > > > > > > software. Once everything was working, I uninstalled all the Cox > > > > > > > software. The next time I rebooted there was no connection, and > > > > > > > ipconfig revealed that I was set back to my old @home ip address. > > I > > > > > > > manually entered the new ip address and gateway (that I had > > received > > > > > > > after converting) in the "alternate" tab in tcp/ip properties, and > > > > > > > regained the connection. It's been good for about 12 hours now, > > but > > > > > > > I'm wondering how long this will last considering ip addresses are > > > > > > > supposed to expire every four hours with the Cox system. . . > > (using > > > > > > > Windows XP). > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any info. you can provide! > > > > > > > Suellen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<N7ce8.7546$jC3.268062@news1.east.cox.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <MUZ98.7520$zb.402377@news1.east.cox.net> <3C68ACEB.D7846525@charter.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f392,a7865c87070b0fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid10f392,public X-Google-Thread: 1136e3,710aa4d82544bdbb X-Google-Attributes: gid1136e3,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,a7865c87070b0fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-24 12:35:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeds-atl1.usenetserver.com!cox.net!news1.east.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Derek M. Loseke" <spamderek@cox.net> Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,cableinet.cable_modems,cox.internet.discussion.athomeconversion References: <I0VX7.10375$B61.4953680@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <3C314C9C.DEDF0FCC@reece.net> <82lY7.33203$K36.11443500@news1.rdc1.va.home.com> <3C334AC0.7C6370B@reece.net> <bc5b60f8.0201170659.1fb61766@posting.google.com> <m_V48.3805$zR3.251588@news2.east.cox.net> <bc5b60f8.0201272107.82cbac8@posting.google.com> <dQo68.4657$Xk4.242975@news1.east.cox.net> <ggS68.7796$Xk4.425111@news1.east.cox.net> <MUZ98.7520$zb.402377@news1.east.cox.net> <3C68ACEB.D7846525@charter.net> Subject: Re: New cox cable managed network Lines: 215 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <N7ce8.7546$jC3.268062@news1.east.cox.net> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:34:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.13.20.92 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news1.east.cox.net 1014582893 68.13.20.92 (Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:34:53 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:34:53 EST Organization: Cox Communications