Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #59Re: Bad Cable Modem/AC Adapter?
From: Miguel Sanchez
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 04:29
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 04:29
51 lines
3407 bytes
3407 bytes
Wow, that is exactly what happened to mine about 2 days ago. Although the rca dcm105 has never really performed flawlessly for me, this is the first time it's behaved this way. Anyway, the AC adapter doesn't seem any warmer than the others on my strip. You might want to check on the pricing structure for subscribers who purchase their own modems. I seem to remember one of the big ISPs recently cutting out most of the benefits of owning modems. I don't remember if it was ATT, Comcast, or another... I'd be interested to know how the new modem works. I've had nothing but trouble with ATTbi support and dread the thought of having to make another call or use their online chat feature. The latter usually results in them writing to me saying i should power cycle the modem and type back the results :) oh, I'm in the bay area as well. Sorry I'm not more helpful. Marc On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:50:30 -0700, Bruce G. Karnacki wrote: > Here's the problem: > > I have my originally issued (12/99 - @home) RCA DCM105 cable modem. It's > been working like a champ until today. > > Twice in the last few hours, all the lights go out, including the power > light. Pushing the on-off button does nothing. The only thing that > will get it back on is to remove power at the ac adapter plug and > replug, or unplug the ac adapter from the wall and replug it. I don't > have to wait any period of time. > > I have noticed that the adapter is very warm, warmer than most ac > adapters that I have, but I don't know how warm it normally is, since > it's always on the floor. It's rated output is 16VDC, 1000mA. I will > try another generic variable adapter, if I can find one, but that may be > hard. > > Has anyone experienced this type of modem behavior? > > ATTBI is scheduled to come out on next Wednesday, and I suspect they > will replace the modem, IF it is not working when they come. I am > tempted to buy my own modem, but with the Comcast soon taking over, I'd > hate to have one that they don't recommend. > > If you're in the SFBay Area, do you know what modem is standard issue > these days? > > Thanks, > Bruce Karnacki
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pan.2002.07.13.21.28.39.944679.8216@noneofyourbusiness.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<WtrX8.156334$Uu2.35135@sccrnsc03>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 113850,64f6d60e02a5ec2c X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,64f6d60e02a5ec2c X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-13 21:29:46 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Miguel Sanchez <msanchez@noneofyourbusiness.org> Subject: Re: Bad Cable Modem/AC Adapter? Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,ba.internet Message-ID: <pan.2002.07.13.21.28.39.944679.8216@noneofyourbusiness.org> References: <WtrX8.156334$Uu2.35135@sccrnsc03> User-Agent: Pan/0.11.2 (Unix) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Comment-To: "Bruce G. Karnacki" <karnacki@invalid.com> Lines: 51 NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.236.11.103 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1026620985 12.236.11.103 (Sun, 14 Jul 2002 04:29:45 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 04:29:45 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 04:29:45 GMT