Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #793Re: Cable modem questions...
From: Mirage
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00
49 lines
3081 bytes
3081 bytes
Generally, a PCI card is better because they are able to engage in IRQ sharing, meaning you don't have to have a dedicated IRQ free like you would with an ISA card - in general. Essentially - you don't need them to install *any* software whatsoever, and it is usually harder to try and uninstall a proprietary form of IE because IE 4.x and above are so closely intertwined with Windoze to begin with. In summary - other than ethernet card drivers, the tech doesn't need to install any software - the service will work just as good (probably better). If you can afford the cost, go get a PCI ethernet card (3Com, Intel, SMC are good brands). If you install the ethernet card beforehand, the only thing the tech will *need* (not *want*) to do is configure the card (IP address, subnet mask, etc.) and physically connect the modem and the card. I'm kind of a rabid opponent of the @home data technicians (due to my own personal experiences with them), but if you can swing it, after the RF tech installs the modem to your wall jack, it might be better to simply meet the data tech at the door, grab the configuration sheet, and send him on his way - unfortunately, this may not be possible. Now - the tech who came out (erroneously) to *install* a cable modem as a result of my trouble call on my existing modem instilled much more confidence: One guy, doing both the RF and the card/software install, and capable of "talking shop" with me (i.e. signal strengths, that the customer service techs seem to be brain-dead at times, etc.) Oh well - good luck. On Tue, 06 Jun 2000 23:55:33 GMT, curley498 <ask@me.com> wrote: >Hi! > >I am getting a cable modem installed this friday, and I have a couple >of questions. I have an option of a PCI or ISA card to be installed >and connected to the cable modem, and I am wondering which one is >better, and why. > >Also, I have heard something about the @home service installing >"spyware", and not to let them install it. Is this true? I won't be >there during the installation, so is there a way to uninstall/block >the software once it has been installed? Will the service still work >just as good if the technician doesn't installt the software? > >Thanks in advance for your help! >Joe.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dtarjsoc4vfp925me5a5q9i3to98pgmk25@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<vn3rjsoh78fr076sntivf0ugf552l6kod3@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10c8f2,a86fc362d2902a7c X-Google-Attributes: gid10c8f2,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,a86fc362d2902a7c X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public From: Mirage <mirage@nospam.net> Subject: Re: Cable modem questions... Date: 2000/06/07 Message-ID: <dtarjsoc4vfp925me5a5q9i3to98pgmk25@4ax.com> X-Deja-AN: 631981132 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <vn3rjsoh78fr076sntivf0ugf552l6kod3@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc2.pa.home.com 960343446 24.23.69.35 (Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:04:06 PDT) Organization: @Home Network MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:04:06 PDT Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,can.internet.highspeed