Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #128Re: Should SQE test be disabled or enabled when connected to a Cisco?
From: Mark Reardon
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:32
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:32
73 lines
4168 bytes
4168 bytes
In article <1992Jul21.144716.4064@midway.uchicago.edu>, chris@gargoyle.uchicago.edu (Chris Johnston) writes: |> In article <1992Jul20.081403.1@ptavv.llnl.gov> oberman@ptavv.llnl.gov writes: |> >In article <1992Jul17.190752.21847@midway.uchicago.edu>, chris@gargoyle.uchicago.edu (Chris Johnston) writes: |> >> |> >> I always turn SQE/Heartbeat OFF for every transceiver. |> > |> >This sort of thing really frustrates me. |> >SQE IS THERE FOR A REASON! TURNING IT OFF IS ASKING FOR TROUBLE! |> > [several paragraphs deleted] |> > |> >R. Kevin Oberman Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |> >Internet: koberman@llnl.gov (510) 422-6955 |> |> 802.3 standard lawyers not withstanding, using the same signal to |> indicate both "Collision" and "Transceiver OK" is a MAJOR DESIGN FLAW. SQE is not "Tranceiver OK". It is instead "tranceiver to station collision signal functional". How else do you test this than by sending a signal through the wire? |> |> I'm still waiting for someone to tell me exactly why turning SQE off |> on every transceiver is a bad idea... I am relieved to learn that |> most, if not all, software/firmware ignores SQE even when it is |> enabled. The reason for it to be on is so that this test is performed. Bad AUI cables and tranceivers can be detected by this test. Running without it is the equivalent of using a table saw without a blade guard. It works well but has its risks. In addition, software that ignores SQE is poor software. The driver should at least count the errors and let the user view the count at their option. Also, since most chips require that the bit in the controller be cleared after each transmission, not have SQE on adds to the nodes software overhead. |> |> For now SQE stays disabled on my net. The risk of losing one computer |> is trivial compared to the risk of losing the entire network. (I'm |> always open to and invite arguements against this policy.) I don't understand this statement. If a tranceiver can't tell a host that a collision has occurred, that host will be misbehaving. It can take a network to a crawl and it (the host) will not know that its own transmissions have been garbled. I know of at least one system administrator that lost his job because a faulty tranceiver caused his network to not function properly for a couple of days. Once his superiors knew that the problem could have been avoided with proper wiring, they decided to hire someone to do the job right. How do you find faulty collision detection circuitry without SQE? How do you even know that is your problem? What harm does using SQE cause? |> |> IMPORTANT: Remember, the standard does say turn off SQE/Heartbeat/Jam |> when connecting a transceiver to a repeater or hub. If you forget |> this your throughput will be very poor. Agreed, and in the spec. |> |> cj |> |> Chris Johnston AM Investors work312-786-4889 home312-761-0091 |> |> If you are "humor challenged" please ignore the following. |> Standards? We don't need no stinking standards. After all, It's magic. |> ...and remember, please don't try this at home I'm a professional. :-) -- Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Mark Reardon | AT&T Tridom | | mwr@eng.tridom.com | 840 Franklin Court | | | Marietta, GA 30067 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul24.153236.9086@tridom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!tridom!tridom!mwrReferences:
<joerg.710663864@neurotic> <1992Jul17.190752.21847@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Jul20.081403.1@ptavv.llnl.gov> <1992Jul21.144716.4064@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!tridom!tridom!mwr From: mwr@tridom.uucp (Mark Reardon) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: Should SQE test be disabled or enabled when connected to a Cisco? Message-ID: <1992Jul24.153236.9086@tridom.com> Date: 24 Jul 92 15:32:36 GMT References: <joerg.710663864@neurotic> <1992Jul17.190752.21847@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Jul20.081403.1@ptavv.llnl.gov> <1992Jul21.144716.4064@midway.uchicago.edu> Sender: news@tridom.com Reply-To: mwr@tridom.uucp (Mark Reardon) Organization: AT&T Tridom; Marietta, Georgia Lines: 73