Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #161Lat/telnet gateway slow ?
From: Per Andersson
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:22
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:22
13 lines
1025 bytes
1025 bytes
Hi. Id like to hear other peoples opinions of the IGS as a Lat/Telnet gateway. I do a conversion through an autocommand containing 'rlogin foo.bar.se' so that it will ask the nameserver each time it connects. We got this IGS to replace a couple of Descstation 3100:s running what DEC call lattelnet or msglattelnet or something, which basically is a getty process that does telnet instead of logging in. To our surprise the Decstation has better throughput with 30-40 users than the IGS when I'm running alone through it. Anybody have bright ideas or comments ? /Per
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr14.152235.18569@kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!gatech!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!perandShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!gatech!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!perand From: perand@stacken.kth.se (Per Andersson) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Lat/telnet gateway slow ? Message-ID: <1992Apr14.152235.18569@kth.se> Date: 14 Apr 92 15:22:35 GMT Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet) Organization: Stacken Computer Club, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 13 Nntp-Posting-Host: alex.stacken.kth.se