Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #165traceroute to a cisco
From: Barry Margolin
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 23:05
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 23:05
28 lines
1276 bytes
1276 bytes
When I trace the route to a cisco router, it apparently ignores every other
probe packet. In the example below, Rome and Avignon are two ciscos that
are on the same subnet (131.239.20). This isn't critical, but I'm curious
whether there's an obvious explanation or it's just a bug.
Rome#trace
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: avignon
Translating "AVIGNON"...domain server (131.239.2.1) [OK]
Source address:
Numeric display [n]:
Timeout in seconds [3]:
Probe count [3]: 10
Minimum Time to Live [1]:
Maximum Time to Live [30]:
Port Number [33434]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to AVIGNON.THINK.COM (131.239.20.249)
1 AVIGNON.THINK.COM (131.239.20.249) 4 msec * 4 msec * 0 msec * 0 msec * 4 msec *
Rome#
--
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.
barmar@think.com {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kupdlmINNesb@early-bird.think.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!barmarShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!barmar From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: traceroute to a cisco Date: 15 Apr 1992 23:05:26 GMT Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA Lines: 28 Message-ID: <kupdlmINNesb@early-bird.think.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: telecaster.think.com