Re: backplane backbone, routing or bridging?

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #1818

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#1818

From: NASA ARC NSI Project Office
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 22:58

9 lines
951 bytes

Vince responded to this already, since I was on travel, and I fully agree
with his response.  I think the routing protocol can support a very large
degree of functionality, and the IP forwarder support should support this
level of functionality as well.  Did you see PT's latest note on a modified
patricia approach?

					Thanks,
					   Milo

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9106282258.AA01847@cincsac.arc.nasa.gov>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!csn!boulder!recnews

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!csn!boulder!recnews
From: medin@nsipo.nasa.gov (NASA ARC NSI Project Office)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: backplane backbone, routing or bridging?
Message-ID: <9106282258.AA01847@cincsac.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: 28 Jun 91 22:58:26 GMT
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 9
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jun 91 00:43:37 MDT."
             <9106260741.AA02847@wolf.cisco.com>
Return-Path: <cisco-request@spot.Colorado.EDU>