🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #1831

tac@cisco.com

#1831
From: Tom Stephens
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:45
12 lines
1108 bytes
I could be mistaken, but I thought I read a while ago that cs@cisco.com was going away and was becoming tac@cisco.com.  Last week I sent mail to tac@cisco.com and received no response.  I then deceided to call the 800 # and was put in contact with someone who solved my problem.  The question is...  is tac@cisco.com a valid address to send problems too?  If not what is?  I can dig up the mail I sent if anyone from cisco wants me to.  

Just thought you should know.

PS.  I sent the mail out at 0901 on 01/13/93 and still have received no bounce or reply.  Maybe the date had something to do with it.  ;-)

---
---------------------------------
Tom Stephens
Corporate Computing and Networks, Chippewa Falls, WI
Cray Research Inc.  hens@cray.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan22.134532.8402@walter.cray.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!walter.cray.com!snipe!hens

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!walter.cray.com!snipe!hens
From: hens@cray.com (Tom Stephens)
Subject: tac@cisco.com
Message-ID: <1993Jan22.134532.8402@walter.cray.com>
Lines: 13
Nntp-Posting-Host: snipe.cray.com
Reply-To: hens@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 22 Jan 93 13:45:32 CST