Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #1836Re: re:ip tcp header-compression experience
From: Tony Li
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 10:03
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 10:03
25 lines
1617 bytes
1617 bytes
In article <OLAV.KVITTEM.93Jan25102536@delab.sintef.no> Olav.Kvittem@delab.sintef.no writes:
What about higher speed links - how fast can a cisco run
TCP Header compression - can it be done on 512 Kbps links and
if so - what CPU-size is needed ?
My tests (under lab conditions) show that we could saturate a 72k link
doing an FTP (i.e., big packets) and consume about 10% of a CSC/3. This
would suggest that a single 512K link would pretty well consume a CSC/3.
You might get away with it with a CSC/4.
However, I'm not convinced that this is going to be a significant win.
Header compression provides the biggest advantage if you're using lots of
small packets (i.e., telnet sessions).
Does the number of simultanesous sessions have to be limited to
allow any effect ?
Yes. Header compression only can cache up to 254 (default 16) connections.
--
abyss \*-'bis\ n
1 : the bottomless gulf, pit, or chaos of the old cosmogonies 2 a : an
immeasurably deep gulf or great space b : intellectual or spiritual
profundity; also : vast moral depravity 3 a Border Intermediate System
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k0dt8INN8h@cronkite.cisco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!tliReferences:
<727810442.26482@news.Colorado.EDU> <OLAV.KVITTEM.93Jan25102536@delab.sintef.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!tli From: tli@cisco.com (Tony Li) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: re:ip tcp header-compression experience Date: 25 Jan 1993 10:03:19 GMT Organization: cisco Systems, Menlo Park, California, USA Lines: 25 Message-ID: <1k0dt8INN8h@cronkite.cisco.com> References: <727810442.26482@news.Colorado.EDU> <OLAV.KVITTEM.93Jan25102536@delab.sintef.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lager.cisco.com