🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #1848

Anyone using ATG?

#1848
From: jrb
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:02
14 lines
1143 bytes
Hi Folks,

I have Cisco 4000 and an IGS/R.  The 4000 is running version 9.1 and the IGS/R is running 8.3.  I am trying to use the
address translation gateway feature to connect two decnet networks that have addresses in the same decnet area via a 56k phone line.
I have been unable to get this working.  The Tech support folk at cisco now say that the ATG function will only work if you are
mapping the addresses on a single local router, and not accross a phone circuit.  

Is this true?  Can this be possible?  It makes the ATG functionality near useless as far as I can tell.... it would only work if
were routing between two local ethernets.  I'm surprised because I was very clear when I purchased the Ciscos about what I am
trying to do, and I was assured the the ATG functionality would work.  Is anyone out there using it?

Thanks,
Jim Bresee
jrb@idx.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.140248.68@idx.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!emba-news.uvm.edu!idx.com!jrb

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!emba-news.uvm.edu!idx.com!jrb
From: jrb@idx.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Anyone using ATG?
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.140248.68@idx.com>
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:02:48 GMT
Organization: IDX Corporation, S. Burlington, VT
Lines: 15