Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #1852Re: Routing with non standard addressing
From: Tony Li
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:55
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:55
24 lines
1548 bytes
1548 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.160333.901@icl.se> mniku@icl.se (Markku Niku ICL/Swe) writes:
We need to set up a simple routed network. We've asked our Cisco gugrus
of this configuration, and the answers are just now : 4 = it works, 4 = it
doesn't.
It doesn't. You can consider this definitive. But you're close.
Could somebody with experience of this give me a hint.
As we are not in need to have more than about 20-30 nodes in the C net,
we'd like to split it to 7bit host addresses
This can't work because you can't have a 1 bit subnet mask. You have to
have at LEAST two bits.
[picture with discontiguous subnets]
Routing is to be static or IGRP.
This won't work with IGRP because IGRP cannot support discontiguous
subnets. If you get version 9.1 and use static routing, or use OSPF you
can do this.
Tony Li
cisco Engineering
--
abyss \*-'bis\ n
1 : the bottomless gulf, pit, or chaos of the old cosmogonies 2 a : an
immeasurably deep gulf or great space b : intellectual or spiritual
profundity; also : vast moral depravity 3 a Border Intermediate System
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k5im8INNe16@cronkite.cisco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!tliReferences:
<1993Jan21.160333.901@icl.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!tli From: tli@cisco.com (Tony Li) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: Routing with non standard addressing Date: 27 Jan 1993 08:55:36 GMT Organization: cisco Systems, Menlo Park, California, USA Lines: 24 Message-ID: <1k5im8INNe16@cronkite.cisco.com> References: <1993Jan21.160333.901@icl.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lager.cisco.com