How reliable are 9.1 sub-releases ?

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #1882

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#1882

From: Jean-Philippe Martin-Flatin
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:33

23 lines
1247 bytes

How reliable are 9.1 sub-releases ? We are currently hesitating between
the following to upgrade all our CISCOs:

	9.0(3.x)
	9.1(1.x)
	9.1(2.1)

Each of them fixes some bugs we suffer from. But the whole 9.1 release
has had a bad reputation so far, and our distributor seems quite afraid
to let us go beyond 9.0(3) ! Does anybody have some experience with these
sub-releases ? Positive or negative ?

The protocols we are interested in are IP, ARP, RARP, Decnet and Novell.

Thanks

/----------------------------------------------------\
| Jean-Philippe Martin-Flatin                        |
| European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts |
| Shinfield Park                                     |
| Reading RG2 9AX                                    |
| Great-Britain                                      |
\----------------------------------------------------/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C0G3J1.4sv@ecmwf.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pyrltd!ecmwf!syj

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pyrltd!ecmwf!syj
From: syj@ecmwf.co.uk (Jean-Philippe Martin-Flatin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: How reliable are 9.1 sub-releases ?
Message-ID: <C0G3J1.4sv@ecmwf.co.uk>
Date: 6 Jan 93 18:33:00 GMT
Sender: usenet@ecmwf.co.uk (NEWS deafult user)
Organization: ECMWF
Lines: 23