Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #200Multiple subnet problem
From: Tony Li
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:10
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:10
33 lines
1650 bytes
1650 bytes
According to my experience, secondary addresses on cisco routers work only if the other nodes are not aware of the subnetting (so that they still think it is one big network), but even in this case, proxy-arp would be more appropriate. However, if You are using (for the sake of example) two class-C networks on the same Ethernet (or a class-B and class-C network), they are not announced to each other. +---------+ | Cisco | primary : 192.1.1.20 +---------+ secondary : 192.1.2.20 ! =============================================== ! ! +---------+ +---------+ | Node A | 192.1.1.10 | Node B | 192.1.2.15 +---------+ +---------+ In this example, Cisco would not announce network 192.1.1.0 to node B unless split-horizon is disabled (and that only works in 9.0-only environment). "no ip split-horizon" was introduced in 8.3(3). If you do not depend on your hosts snooping on RIP, then you wont need this. I hope there is a better way around this problem, as I am afraid I will encounter it in a near future. Any other solutions out there ? A better solution is to run GDP on your nodes. Tony
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9208122010.AA15290@cider.cisco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnewsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Subject: Multiple subnet problem In-Reply-To: Ivan Pepelnjak's message of 12-Aug-92 20:58:15 <9208130105.AA3d66@GARFY.nil.yu> Message-ID: <9208122010.AA15290@cider.cisco.com> Sender: news@colorado.edu Date: 12 Aug 92 13:10:02 -0700 Lines: 33