🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #2122

Re: why the Router still answer ? (to a ping or a tracert )

#2122
From: Javier Henderson
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00
12 lines
1081 bytes
"emery" <emery-ph@iprolink.ch> writes:

> I have done the config for two Router for a DMZ and  I have desactivate  UDP
> small server , tcp small serveur and no finger etc...
> 
> and i was thincking he will not answer to a ping but he still answer.

	What exactly did you disable, besides the udp/tcp small
servers and the finger services?

-jav
Technical Details
Message-ID: <861zux4emc.fsf@limpia.kjsl.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <35366875.0@news.iprolink.ch>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9325,171bcac383d6c1e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9325,public
X-Google-Thread: 110acc,171bcac383d6c1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid110acc,public
X-Google-Thread: 113d97,171bcac383d6c1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid113d97,public
X-Google-Thread: 102702,171bcac383d6c1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid102702,public
From: Javier Henderson <Javier@Cisco.COM>
Subject: Re: why the Router  still answer ?  (to a ping or a tracert )
Date: 1998/04/16
Message-ID: <861zux4emc.fsf@limpia.kjsl.com>
X-Deja-AN: 344807423
References: <35366875.0@news.iprolink.ch>
Organization: Utterly disorganized
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,fa.cisco,fr.comp.securite