Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #2153Re: Question about X25 - IP Gateway on CISCO or MOTOROLA
From: syco
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00
41 lines
2579 bytes
2579 bytes
Patrick Buick a �crit dans le message <8F6479B6Dpbuickbelayenterpris@198.80.55.10>... |While I don't know the answer, I'll do my best to say what I think he is |asking. | |He wants to have remote X.25 stations coming into a central IP host via |translation of the X.25 into IP in order to attach to the application. He |only knows about the XOT on Cisco, which isn't what he needs. | |As this is not within my knowledge yet, I'll defer to the more |knowledgeable in the group, but my initial thoughts are that the remote |stations will have to tunnel IP into X.25 for this to work, but perhaps |not. | Yes ! It's exactly what i'm saying ( sorry for my poor syntax ) I don't want XOT ( i know XOT ), 'cause i don't want X25 in my host. I know Cisco 'TRANSLATE' and MOTOROLA 'TPDU' too; but it seems the two of them cant Translate only 'SERIAL' protocols. My stations, and my host, run X25 applications : true X25, SYNCHRONOUS, not PAD. Ken Felix a �crit dans le message <395D6C2F.BE09099B@mindspring.com>... |>I think he is asking can x.25 be tunnel thru cisco and motorola and the |>answer is yes for both. Motorola Vanguard and cisco routers can handle |>XOT. I use XOT today. This is why I need another method to extract the application from X25. -- in other words : I need to eliminate X25 protocol. whereas XOT does not allow it. |> |>setup and configuration examples; |> |>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios11/cbook/cx25 |>.htm#xtocid2349648 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8jpj6j$faq$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8jhh27$9nc$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <%_875.1282$Q8.7903@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net> <395D6C2F.BE09099B@mindspring.com> <8F6479B6Dpbuickbelayenterpris@198.80.55.10>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10b304,29d18d24252d9487 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b304,public X-Google-Thread: 10232b,29d18d24252d9487 X-Google-Attributes: gid10232b,public X-Google-Thread: 104b6e,29d18d24252d9487 X-Google-Attributes: gid104b6e,public X-Google-Thread: 102702,c2bf2450acc06d6f X-Google-Attributes: gid102702,public From: "syco" <sycoweb@chez.com> Subject: Re: Question about X25 - IP Gateway on CISCO or MOTOROLA Date: 2000/07/03 Message-ID: <8jpj6j$faq$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> X-Deja-AN: 641743986 References: <8jhh27$9nc$1@pollux.ip-plus.net> <%_875.1282$Q8.7903@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net> <395D6C2F.BE09099B@mindspring.com> <8F6479B6Dpbuickbelayenterpris@198.80.55.10> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Complaints-To: news@ip-plus.net X-Trace: pollux.ip-plus.net 962613267 15706 212.103.3.2 (3 Jul 2000 08:34:27 GMT) Organization: sycoweb NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jul 2000 08:34:27 GMT Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco,fr.comp.reseaux.ip,alt.certification.cisco,alt.fan.cisco