Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #221[kquinlan@CVEDG.Prime.COM: x25 route, "alias" clause]
From: Eman Schaffer
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 23:21
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 23:21
68 lines
2528 bytes
2528 bytes
Hi Kevin, > I would like to get our CGS 3 router to accept X25 calls for 2 addresses. > > I was working on this when we upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0(1) today. > > In the 8.2 config I had an X25 route phrase like this: > > x25 route ^23421234567890 alias Null0 > > To be frank, I do not know if this does what I want, because I had not > tested it before the new PROMS arrived. However it is a bit academic, > as (from my experimentation) 9.0(1) will not accept the null interface > in an X25 route command. I get told "Must be running X.25 - Null0" - > fair enough, but 8.2 didn't complain! > Correct, 9.0 and 8.3 do not accept NULL in this command anymore. They require a serial line number instead. > What I would like to do is to set up the router to accept calls that > are addressed to an X121 number other than that applied to the serial > interfaces, I understood from the manual that this is what the "alias" > clause would do. But if I cannot give the null interface, what Sure enough. > interface should I use? What does the interface name mean when an > alias is specified? Is it for calls that come in that interface only, > or is the call sent back to that interface? Or does the call appear to > come from that interface? > an alias route is valid only for calls that come in on the named interface. Example: x25 route .* alias serial 0 If a call comes in on interface serial 0 and matches the alias' x121-pattern (and any cud pattern) or in my example any x121 address, the call will be accepted for the given type of connectivity. > In case anyone from Cisco says that I should ask them, I should say > that our local UK technical support people cannot help, and asking the > net seemed like the next quickest route. But in case anyone is Please feel free to ask the net any time. > interested; it is my view that the manual (including the 9.0 manual) > is a little vague on this point. > I totaly agree here and I will submit a documentation bug to correct this problem. Thanks, Eman Schaffer Customer Engineering > Kevin Quinlan > -- > > (Kevin Quinlan) > kquinlan@cvedg.Prime.COM > kquinlan@uk.co.cv.edg > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9208172321.AA27127@last-call.cisco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnewsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews From: Eman Schaffer <eschaffe@cisco.com> Subject: [kquinlan@CVEDG.Prime.COM: x25 route, "alias" clause] Message-ID: <9208172321.AA27127@last-call.cisco.com> Sender: news@colorado.edu Date: 17 Aug 92 16:21:36 -0700 Lines: 68