🚀 go-pugleaf

In comp.dcom.sys.cisco Adrian Jensen <ad_jensen@hotmail.com> wrote:
> fugi wrote:
> [snip]
>> 
>> no it doesn't, my code I posted on the day the advisory came out
>> at 11:30pm was abused by someone who got it from a friend that
>> wasn't supposed to give it away. hence the sending via PGP and the
>> sentence "don't distribute this". mine calculated the ttl to send
>> in the packet with a traceroute, and there was a field for "ttl
>> padding". a number that represented a negative and positive offset
>> to add accountability for the oops factor. that's what I get for
>> writing user friendly code.
>> 
>> 

> Oh yah? Your "[L0cK]"??? Your description doesn;t match the code I saw, 
> it was not PGP signed, did not have a "do not distribute" message, and 
> you have to calculate the TTL (with a ping according to the comment), it 
> doesn't do it for you.

> Adrian

no I'm not. you do realize there were like 20 different people who
posted code for it. and for the TTL setting... ok I think even a
script kiddie can do a traceroute. however they may pound a router
for an hour with it looping because it's not going down because
they never checked to see if the route was filtered. otherwise,
hping,sendip,packet, and other system tools are good for script
kiddies too. not all that complicated...


> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

-- 
The complexity of a weapon is inversely proportional to the IQ of
the weapon's operator.