🚀 go-pugleaf

Findo;

In general, what you have said is true.  If the router interface is
192.168.0.1/28 and the PIX outside is 192.168.0.2 thru .14, you will be o.k.

You have used a zero-subnet in your example and should account for this in
your router configuration if you have not already done this.

I don't know how good the "Babel Fish" engine is, but here are the results:

In generale, che cosa avete detto � allineare. Se l' interfaccia del router
� 192,168,0,1/28 e la parte esterna di PIX � 192,168,0,2 attraverso 14,
sarete approvati.

Avete usato una zero-sottorete nel vostro esempio e dovreste rappresentare
questo nella vostra configurazione del router se gi� non avete fatto questo.

Buoa fortuna sul vostro progetto!



"findo" <findo@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:9pbcpb$jpb2@imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Thousands Thx.
> But I have one question. I can see the PIX is the member of the subnet
> address ?
> Is it for example my router have ip 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.240 then the
Pix
> also in this subnet without config anythings in PIX?
> "S. Gione" <sgione@hotmail.com> ?????
> news:e7543808.0110011724.169e1dea@posting.google.com...
> > Findo;
> >
> > The normal method by which a PIX is connected to a router is to simply
> > connect it to the same Ethernet segment ... switch, hub, or cross-over
> > cable.
> >
> > The caveat is that the outside IP address of the PIX *MUST* be in the
> > same network/subnet as the Router Ethernet interface.  You do not need
> > to use any routing protocols.
> >
> > If you are looking at the router's routing tables, you should not see
> > the PIX IP address.  What you should see is the Network/subnet
> > address, of which the PIX is a member.
> >
> >
> > "findo" <findo@netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:<9p8sut$riu4@imsp212.netvigator.com>...
> > > Dear,
> > >
> > > Then can you show me the RIP command that can make the PIX connect to
> the
> > > Router?
> > > Just give me an example is ok and enough. Thx
> > > "Walter Roberson" <roberson@ibd.nrc.ca> ���g��l��
> > > news:9p84o3$mgv$1@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca...
> > > > In article <9p3b8f$a8p42@imsp212.netvigator.com>,
> > > > findo <findo@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > > > :I connect the pix to the (2500) router, but the router's routing
> table
> > >  can't
> > > > :see the pix port address? How can I solve it by changing some of
the
> SW
> > > > :parameter.
> > >
> > > > :Please help with giving approximate command in router and PIX
> > > >
> > > > You are not giving us a lot to work on. How have you configured
> > > > the two systems?
> > > >
> > > > Keep in mind that the PIX does not send out any routing information
> > > > by default, so if you are expecting the 2600 to learn the route
> > > > to the PIX, you will have to configure RIP on both ends.
> > > >
> > > > If you are not expecting the 2600 to learn the route from the PIX,
> then
> > > > any routing problem is entirely on the 2600.
>
>