Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #279Re: CAP 6.0 PL126 on RS/6000 and CISCO 9.0(1.11)
From: Charles Hedrick
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:42
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:42
14 lines
1242 bytes
1242 bytes
a0061@rrz.uni-koeln.de (Claus Kalle) writes: >I am trying to get CAP 6.0 PL126 running on AIX 3.2 with a CISCO IPTALK >configuration doing the encaps/decapsulation. The CISCO keeps telling me >about invalid Ethertalk packets encapsulated in IPTALK when I run atistest >under AIX 3.2. And atistest complains that atis is not running ?. >If I leave out the bridgenode in atalk.local, at least atistest can register >its name, but since no bridge, no connectivity to the outside. >Did anyone get such a configuration up and running ? We have moved most of our IPtalk hosts to Ethertalk, but we have a couple of IPtalk left. I can't tell for sure, because the one I know about is down at the moment, but last time I checked, it was working with 9.0(1.xx), for some xx fairly near 11.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Sep.10.01.42.46.1992.21911@athos.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrickReferences:
<1992Sep08.131639.112368@rrz.uni-koeln.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrick From: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: CAP 6.0 PL126 on RS/6000 and CISCO 9.0(1.11) Message-ID: <Sep.10.01.42.46.1992.21911@athos.rutgers.edu> Date: 10 Sep 92 05:42:47 GMT References: <1992Sep08.131639.112368@rrz.uni-koeln.de> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 14