Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #323Re: Subnetting and class B nets
From: Robert Elz
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:35
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:35
20 lines
1148 bytes
1148 bytes
Date: 27 Aug 92 16:36:57+0200
From: Peter Merdian <merdian@rus.uni-stuttgart.dbp.de>
Message-ID: <2299*merdian@rus.uni-stuttgart.dbp.de>
According to RFC 950 only one subnetmask is allowed for an IP network:
I don't think this is true - RFC950 is not highly clear on
the point, but it does seem to suggest that different masks
on different interfaces is possible - and it never says that
that should only happen if the different interfaces are on
different nets.
The problem was never really the spec, but the implementations,
which with any luck will be gradually getting fixed.
Not only does OSPF transport subnet masks around, so does
RIP-II. I'd assume that anything RIP can do IGRP will have
to do too...
kre
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7897.714929735@munnari.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnewsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Subnetting and class B nets
In-Reply-To: Your message of 27 Aug 92 16:36:57 +0200.
<2299*merdian@rus.uni-stuttgart.dbp.de>
Message-ID: <7897.714929735@munnari.oz.au>
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Date: 28 Aug 92 01:35:35 +1000
Lines: 20