DDR vs Dedicated bandwidth

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #341

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#341

From: Chuck Warlick
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:39

14 lines
949 bytes

I have been doing some testing with version 9.0-1 of the routing
software and have come up with something that I can't explain.
I was comparing an ISDN link running DDR through a terminal adapter (Ascend)
and a dedicated link running through a DSU/CSU (Larse).  Both are 384k
but the terminal adapter gives much better performance.  When we put
an analyzer on the link we see periodic delays on the dedicated link but
no delays on the terminal adapter link.  Both are running V.35 on a MCI
card and are simularly configured.  Can anyone explain why these are giving
a large difference in performance ?

Thanks

Chuck Warlick
warlick@theophilus.msfc.nasa.gov

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208271439.AA00614@theophilus>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews
From: warlick@theophilus.msfc.nasa.gov (Chuck Warlick)
Subject: DDR vs Dedicated bandwidth
Message-ID: <9208271439.AA00614@theophilus>
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Date: 27 Aug 92 09:39:14 CDT
Lines: 14