Re: DDR vs Dedicated bandwidth

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #366

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#366

From: Chuck Warlick
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:57

26 lines
1335 bytes

This problem was resolved by turning off fast switching
on the interfaces.  After making the switch all of the 
interfaces in the test at simular rates.


# From warlick Thu Aug 27 09:39:13 1992
# To: Customer-Service@cisco.com, cisco@spot.colorado.edu
# Subject: DDR vs Dedicated bandwidth
# Cc: boeing-eng@tank1
# Content-Length: 658
# 
# I have been doing some testing with version 9.0-1 of the routing
# software and have come up with something that I can't explain.
# I was comparing an ISDN link running DDR through a terminal adapter (Ascend)
# and a dedicated link running through a DSU/CSU (Larse).  Both are 384k
# but the terminal adapter gives much better performance.  When we put
# an analyzer on the link we see periodic delays on the dedicated link but
# no delays on the terminal adapter link.  Both are running V.35 on a MCI
# card and are simularly configured.  Can anyone explain why these are giving
# a large difference in performance ?
# 
# Thanks
# 
# Chuck Warlick
# warlick@theophilus.msfc.nasa.gov
#

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208311857.AA00417@theophilus>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews
From: warlick@theophilus.msfc.nasa.gov (Chuck Warlick)
Subject: Re: DDR vs Dedicated bandwidth
Message-ID: <9208311857.AA00417@theophilus>
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Date: 31 Aug 92 13:57:54 CDT
Lines: 26